David GerardMA to SneerClubEnglish · 3 年前Rationalist posts detailed catalogue of confirmed bad behaviour by EA/rationalist org Nonlinear. Second rationalist goes meta on first post: how can we even know anything, it's so unfair to Nonlinearmessage-squaremessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up124arrow-down1message-squareRationalist posts detailed catalogue of confirmed bad behaviour by EA/rationalist org Nonlinear. Second rationalist goes meta on first post: how can we even know anything, it's so unfair to NonlinearDavid GerardMA to SneerClubEnglish · 3 年前message-square55linkfedilinkfile-text
original post detailing mistreatment of employees meta post about how a good rationalist should correctly epistemically assess the fairness of the post cataloguing and confirming the bad behaviour tl;dr these fucking guys
minus-squareswlabrlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-23 年前It’s only “due diligence” in the lesswrong region of the internet, otherwise it’s just sparkling willful ignorance
minus-squareDavid GerardOPMAlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-23 年前“crux of the problem” was existing English, but the grate branes of CFAR refined its usage into a cult jargon word.
minus-square200fiftylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 年前 this is long and meandering on purpose Well, at least they admit it.
minus-squareswlabrlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 年前Oof, guess I must reread the sequences 10 times as penance. (JK never have, never will.)
It’s only “due diligence” in the lesswrong region of the internet, otherwise it’s just sparkling willful ignorance
Also what does “crux” and/or “cruxy” mean lmfao
deleted by creator
“crux of the problem” was existing English, but the grate branes of CFAR refined its usage into a cult jargon word.
Well, at least they admit it.
Oof, guess I must reread the sequences 10 times as penance. (JK never have, never will.)