@JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish • edit-22 months agoSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down10
arrow-up1433arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.ml@JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish • edit-22 months agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-square@rcbrk@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoAnyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
minus-squareDomilinkfedilink1•2 months agoAnyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes. I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon. If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.
Anyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
Anyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes.
I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon.
If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.