• David GerardOPMA
    link
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    why don’t you look at the paper then and find out

    Correct answers are correct answers.

    you should be so lucky

    So long as users understand the limitations of AI

    this isn’t those people

    • @kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -13
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I have read the paper, how about not immediately jumping to the condescending, patronizing tone?

      Also, you didn’t answer the question. It simply says “users with access to GenAI tools”. You’ve added your own qualifications separate from the question at hand.

      • @swlabr
        link
        English
        151 month ago

        The condescension and patronisation is well deserved. Your question is answered in the fucking title of the paper.

        The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking

        If you’d ever engaged in critical thinking, then maybe we could have avoided this exercise.

      • @selfA
        link
        English
        151 month ago

        how about you go fuck yourself

        The only thing LLMs typically are bad at

        is everything. including summarizing research since it’s pretty fucking obvious you didn’t read shit. now fuck off

        • @selfA
          link
          English
          141 month ago

          also, holy fuck their post history is essentially nothing but unsubtle dogwhistles and pro-AI garbage

          • David GerardOPMA
            link
            English
            121 month ago

            lol the nazi sees nothing wrong with LLMs of course

          • @froztbyte
            link
            English
            81 month ago

            …I did it again. I looked.

            oof.