it’s a fake tweet

  • Kalcifer
    link
    fedilink
    51
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Please tag your post as a joke, not real, or similar. If you leave it in its current state [2], you are knowingly peddling disinformation [1].

    Update (2025-03-06T01:45Z): OP has modified the post’s body stating that it’s a fake tweet [3]. Imo, the title should preface that it’s fake [1].

    References
    1. Type: Article. Title: “Trump post saying US president should be impeached if Dow drops 1,000 points in 2 days isn’t real”. Author: “Jordan Liles”. Publisher: “Snopes”. Published: 2023-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:37Z. URI: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-post-dow-impeachment/.
      • ¶4.

        […] Trump did not post a 2012 tweet saying the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 1,000 points in two days should result in a U.S. president’s immediate impeachment. […]

    2. Type: Post (Through: App (Name: “Thunder”.)). Title: “I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already”. Author: “@spujb@lemmy.cafe”. Publisher: [“Political Memes” (“!politicalmemes@lemmy.world”). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:42Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.

    3. Type: Post (Through: Website (Name: “sh.itjust.works”)). Title: “I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already”. Author: “@spujb@lemmy.cafe”. Publisher: [“Political Memes” (“!politicalmemes@lemmy.world”). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:54Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.

    • Sundray
      link
      fedilink
      English
      722 days ago

      Just a harmless observation here, but I can’t help but notice that liberals spend way too much time de-bunking, but not nearly enough time bunking.

        • Sundray
          link
          fedilink
          English
          922 days ago

          Good question! I mean, I’m not suggesting that the left should create compelling, motivating, entertaining (but not necessarily “literally” true) content targeting low-information voters in an effort to swamp out fascist garbage. Nor would I imply that the time has come to use every underhanded, dirty, ratfucking trick in the book to make those voters distrust Republicans. Heaven forbid!

          But I will say outright that in my estimation the left’s fastidious, timid, mousy attempts to debunk the tidal wave of fascist bullshit is not working out very well.

          • @spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            322 days ago

            too much sarcasm i was being genuine. if you want to give me a real answer feel free but i literally cannot parse what you mean here :(

            • Sundray
              link
              fedilink
              English
              321 days ago

              We need more viral leftist shitposting, and less concern about getting every single fact exatly right.

              • @spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                221 days ago

                oh okay thank you!

                yeah actually a lot of my account is focused doing exactly that :) this is reposted, but my original content i try to keep very rhetorically effective—and i also fact check it (unlike this trainwreck lol)

    • @spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      722 days ago

      mods say im fine also i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.

      • Kalcifer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 days ago

        […] i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.

        What? I haven’t deleted, nor reposted anything in this context. Are you sure you aren’t just getting a ping because I @mentioned you in the comment’s references [1]?

        References
        1. Type: Comment (Through: Website. Name: “sh.itjust.works”.). Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already”. Author: “@spujb@lemmy.cafe”. Publisher: [“Political Memes” (!politicalmemes@lemmy.world). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.]. Published: 2025-03-06T01:56:28Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T02:26Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.
            • Highlighted in yellow are the mentions to @spujb@lemmy.cafe’s contained within the comment’s “References” spoiler.
      • Kalcifer
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        I think OP is editing this comment [1] in bad faith:

        • Current version [1.1]:

        • Original version [1.2]:

        References
        1. Type: Comment. Author: “@spujb@lemmy.cafe”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already”. Author: “@spujb@lemmy.cafe”. Publisher: [“Political Memes” (“!politicalmemes@lemmy.world”). “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.]. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095972.
          1. (Through: Website. Name: “sh.itjust.works”.). Published: 2025-03-06T00:02:54Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T02:04Z.
          2. (Through: App. Name: “Thunder”.). Published: 2025-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T00:01:03Z.