Everybody loves Wikipedia, the surprisingly serious encyclopedia and the last gasp of Old Internet idealism!

(90 seconds later)

We regret to inform you that people write credulous shit about “AI” on Wikipedia as if that is morally OK.

Both of these are somewhat less bad than they were when I first noticed them, but they’re still pretty bad. I am puzzled at how the latter even exists. I had thought that there were rules against just making a whole page about a neologism, but either I’m wrong about that or the “rules” aren’t enforced very strongly.

    • selfA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 个月前

      also lol @

      Vibe coding, sometimes spelled vibecoding

      cause I love the kayfabe linguistic drift for a term that’s not even a month old that’s probably seen more use in posts making fun of the original tweet than any of the shit the Wikipedia article says

      • bitofhope
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 个月前

        Promptfondler (from Old French prompette-fondeleur)

    • selfA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 个月前

      did you know: you too can make your dreams come true with Vibe Coding ™ thanks to this article’s sponsors:

      Replit Agent, Cursor Composer, Pythagora, Bolt, Lovable, and Cline

      and other shameful assholes with cash to burn trying to astroturf a term from a month old Twitter brainfart into relevance

      • blakestaceyOPA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        9 个月前

        Vibe coding? Back in my day, we called it teledildonics.

        • selfA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 个月前

          this would explain so much about the self-declared 10x programmers I’ve met

          • bitofhope
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 个月前

            10x programmers used to be a real thing but they got obsoleted by TOPS-20.

    • blakestaceyOPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 个月前

      None of my acquaintances who have Wikipedian insider experience have much familiarity with the “Did you know” box. It seems like a niche within a niche that operates without serious input from people who care about the rest of the project.

      “In The News” is apparently also an editor clique with its own weird dynamics, but it doesn’t elevate as many weird tiny articles to the Main Page because the topics there have to be, you know, in the news.

      • David GerardMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 个月前

        yeah, “Did you know” exists to encourage new articles, or major expansions of old ones. it cycles every six hours I think.

        • blakestaceyOPA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 个月前

          From how they’re labeled, I think they cycle every day?

    • screechingtardBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 个月前

      Vibe coding for me will always be the moment we hit peak “AI” Its literally the term con artists use to hock their witchcraft remedies.