Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
New paper on LLMs just dropped, titled LLMs Can Get “Brain Rot”!
Currently a novelty at this point, but could prove useful to make the likes of Iocaine and Nepenthes more effective - especially since the paper notes:
It does also suggest doing some actual quality control to prevent damage to the LLMs, but that sure ain’t happening
The paper is itself written by LLM.
Fuck.
@BlueMonday1984 this is interesting, but I’m cautious about generalizing the results, because they constructed the “brainrot” M1 dataset from “popular on X/twitter”. it’s not clear to me that “popular on bluesky” would have the same effects, other than the general observation that “popular” posts tend to be short meme-ish text that’s difficult to interpret when separated from its context