In which a man disappearing up his own asshole somehow fails to be interesting.

  • @blakestaceyOPMA
    link
    English
    179 months ago

    Graham takes the nebulous concept of “best” and, at great length and with great effort, fails to bring clarity.

  • David GerardMA
    link
    English
    149 months ago

    I graded a lot of humanities papers in a previous career. One of the weirder genres of bad paper would come from very smart computer science/math/physics majors who didn’t have time to do any of the assigned reading and just kind of tried to answer the prompt from first principles without citing any primary sources or other scholarship.

    This feels like that paper, except the author isn’t a stressed-out college sophomore but a 59 year old “thought leader” with a large audience who gets Sam Altman to read his drafts. No attempt to engage with the history of the genre at all, or with the many other writers who have considered the form, and no examples cited except a famous scientific article by Darwin.

    • @Evinceo
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      I knew that was idle words, lol. Classic essay.

  • @swlabr
    link
    English
    119 months ago

    Despite its title this isn’t meant to be the best essay

    Oh, thanks for clarifying, that was really hard to figure out. /s

    • @sinedpick
      link
      English
      109 months ago

      This is (not) the greatest essay in the world, no. This is just a tribute.

      • @swlabr
        link
        English
        79 months ago

        Haha I had that drafted and decided that, in the spirit of the post, I’d write something less good

      • @froztbyte
        link
        English
        49 months ago

        I want to make the other tribute joke, but it’s really not like we need more heroic valorising going for that dipshit

    • @bitofhope
      link
      English
      89 months ago

      If I post this kind of inane drivel, I’ll at least make sure the title does not suggest it to be my best work.

  • @gerikson
    link
    English
    99 months ago

    This is basically the quintessential example of “I am a smart person, I think like an LLM, therefore the LLM is smart too”:

    While comparing ordinary human activity to language modeling is perhaps the greatest intellectual cliche of 2024, what PG describes in the essay-writing process itself essentially boils down to beam search. Autocomplete, find wrongness, backtrack, predict more consistent series of next tokens. The fact that only one of those options is actually reflected on the screen doesn’t change the fact that the writer is probability-weighting continuations in their head.

  • @selfMA
    link
    English
    79 months ago

    holy fuck this is meandering and written like shit. like, marvel at this early paragraph:

    There is, and on the face of it, it seems almost identical to the one I started with. Instead of asking what would the best essay be? I should have asked how do you write essays well? Though these seem only phrasing apart, their answers diverge. The answer to the first question, as we’ve seen, isn’t really about essay writing. The second question forces it to be.

    this quote looks like nonsense because Paully’s paragraph flow is absolutely fucked and his sentence structure isn’t much better. did he copy Marc Andreessen‘s absolute garbage writing style, or did he figure he no longer needs to pay an editor now that he’s tricked my industry into thinking he’s a great writer?

    • @selfMA
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      also, I don’t remember paully’s blog looking this ugly:

      it actually took my eyes a while to see the header at all, and the weird janky “Read More”…. thing? he does on every page will lose your scroll position every time the tab reloads, plus it appears even on pages that don’t have any More to Read

      is that a fucking shopping cart in the corner?

      how reassuring. I legitimately can’t figure out what this is for; I don’t think you can buy any of paully boy’s books direct (and why would you?) and unless I’m missing something in the mess that is the sidebar there’s no swag he’s selling (but again, why would you buy that?)

      so questions:

      • is my industry finally done pretending hacker news is ugly and broken as fuck on purpose?
      • is Paul fucking Graham’s blog hosted on Shopify? I’m not near a computer to check what javascript’s being loaded but this shit is seriously making me flash back to the last time I had to do a godawful Shopify theme for a client

      e: yep, I did a tiny amount of digging. if you send paully’s blog a mobile user-agent, it sends a version of his blog that’s (for some fucking reason) hosted on Yahoo Small Business/Yahoo Stores (now Turbify) which is a preconfigured e-commerce site. this lazy asshole fucked up building a mobile site so bad (and his desktop site isn’t much less ugly) that he decided he’d go off the fucking deep end and shove all his writing into a barely customized online storefront instead. this is seriously the type of shit that some of my less computer-savvy clients would demand I do back when I was working through college

      • @froztbyte
        link
        English
        7
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        you gotta admit, putting forth one thing while trying to convince you it’s some other thing (and that there totally isn’t a business side associated to it… right…) is extremely on brand for him and basically everything he puts his money behind

        so this is delightfully poignant

      • @gerikson
        link
        English
        69 months ago

        to be fair, his desktop site has wrapped around to being charmingly retro

      • @Evinceo
        link
        English
        49 months ago

        The shopping cart is presumably because he did E Commerce when he did an actual job.

    • @blakestaceyOPMA
      link
      English
      79 months ago

      Paul Graham needs to take a lesson from Jenny Nicholson and organize his thoughts into a numbered list.

  • @gerikson
    link
    English
    69 months ago

    Currently #2 on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39662615

    I have zero interest in reading the post or the comments, the link is provided as a public service.

    (BTW not everything by paulg submitted to HN is received rapturously. At least some members of the community can recognize his fatuousness)

    • @selfMA
      link
      English
      109 months ago

      a few posters over there have even called it out as reading like it’s AI generated. it doesn’t entirely have the tone for it, but paully g plagiarizing an essay by having GPT generate it and editing it to sound slightly more like something he’d write almost makes sense — it’d explain why this thing is so fucking long but doesn’t seem to say a damn thing. the problem is, a lot of his pre-gpt writing is exactly like that too.

      • @gerikson
        link
        English
        129 months ago

        It’s fascinating to see how the narrative (at least in tech circles) has gone in the last 6 months or so: from “I typed a prompt and got a college-level essay” to “no way this [rich][powerful][respected] VC could write anything so incoherent, he must have used an LLM”

        • David GerardMA
          link
          English
          9
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          or alternately

          This sounds like how I would write when I was on adderall. I mean, what the hell is this statement?

          assholes like this are giving adderall a bad name

        • @swlabr
          link
          English
          69 months ago

          Pretty sure if I asked ChatGPT about essay writing tips or what the best essay ever looked like, it would be more coherent than this rancid melange.

        • @Evinceo
          link
          English
          59 months ago

          No way PG has the attention span to write this much.

  • tygerprints
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    Uhhhh what now? How does writing an essay about how an essay should be an essay that is surprising, somehow fail to be utterly surprising or even all that interesting?