I understand that sharing video, photos, documents etc. is relatively safe because the data is not executed in the processor as instructions. How come people are willing to download and install pirated software though? How can one be confident that it does not contain malicious addons? Are people just don’t know the risks? Or are there protection mechanisms that I am missing? I mean since the software is usually cracked there is not much use in comparing checksums with the originals, is it?

  • @Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    How come people are willing to download and install pirated software though?

    You can just remove “priated” from that statement and come to the same conclusions. Considering the amount of bugs, backdoors and 0-day exploits distributed via official software I sometimes wonder why people execute proprietary, closed source programs at all.

    An no, “reputable” companies mean nothing, just look at Microsoft clowning around with their signing keys.

  • @InterSynth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    I trust pirates more than billion or trillion dollar companies. Also, aggressive DRM such as iLok is worse than malware, so eh.

  • @pre@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Worth noting that paying for a license for software doesn’t stop it being spying malware either. In fact the pirate versions often take out the spying and the reporting-to-homebase that proprietary software does.

    The photoshop that phones home to check a license is arguably more malicious than the pirate version that has been cracked so it doesn’t do that.

    • @alexg_k@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Good and valid point. I use opensource software wherever I can.

      Though paid software is not going to encrypt your data for ransom or use a keylogger to steal bitcoin (yet).

      • @NullGator@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        There was an antivirus that was caught running a bitcoin miner in the background tbf. If memory serves it was Norton?

        • Azzy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It was opt-in, and I think to make your subscription cheaper. Then again, Norton sucks!

  • b1ab
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Long story short.

    1. Be prepared for disaster.
    2. Scan it. Sandbox it if concerned.
    3. Firewall inspect/block/allow every outbound comm.
    4. Get it from a trusted source.

    Basically the same stuff you should be doing with all software.

    Edit for firewall clarification.

      • b1ab
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I don’t really use Windows except for playing games, so someone else may have a better answer.

        For me, I want 3 types of protection, priority order.

        1. Rootkit and ransomware protection. Lock down and protect system files.

        2. Firewall. Stop software from calling home (and possibly invalidating my forged license) and to stop malware from reaching out to command and control systems.

        3. Malware scanning and suspect execution detection. Most antivirus software detections will be in only one of a couple categories: keygen, generic trojan, or obfuscated executable. If I encounter this, I go to VirusTotal.com and drop the offending file(s) for it to scan. If I’m still concerned I will use an online sandbox execution recorder that tells you what the exe does such as outbound comms, file modifications, registry read/writes, etc.

        Windows Defender accomplishes these requirements. Although it is a bit clunky and other mainstream antivirus (paid or free) accomplish the same in a much cleaner interface.

        I cannot stress enough the importance of downloading pirated software from a trusted source.

        • @MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          We are seeing on our corporate network lots of browser hikackers that connect to c&c and are used in botnet DDOS as a service. Once you install x software it sets up a persistent service that keeps modding chrome.exe etc

          Firewalling the .exe that you installed does nothing to stop the calls to c&c

          • b1ab
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Fair point. Malware can tunnel through existing comms, thus firewalling the exe would do little to protect you.

            That’s why I recommended a multilayered defense and practicing good opsec.

            An exe that installs a service, modifies unrelated executables, and sends comms through an unrelated application would be a catastrophic failure in any good defense.

            If your system is this wide open then you’ll be likely to have all sorts of problems from non pirated software. Such as freeware that installs adware.

            I have tried to find these in the wild to no avail.

            • @MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Unfortunately the machines that get infected are not fully controlled by us but they get networking and internet from us (space rental in the building), so we isolate them as much as possible and we black hole all the bad traffic on the router level.

              Our machines all have EDR and strict security policies. Not much gets past that.

      • b1ab
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I don’t.

        But I take many precautions.

        I’ve been pirating software since the C64. About 40 years. Never stopped. Never will.

        I buy the good software I encounter. As a developer, i know it’s important to keep funding further development. Unfortunately most is overpriced garbage.

        • @Micromot@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          I’m pretty new and extremely cautious with pirated software, i still need to find the precautions i have to take, luckily pirating games is much safer and easier than pirating software

          • @7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Could you elaborate how pirating games is “safer” than pirating software? Both are executables that could run whatever code they wish on your system, and since pirated games are so desirable, in my experience they are far more often spread around bundled with malware than software is. Oftentimes, you’ll find people take legitimate repacks, add malware, then share the repack under the same repackers name.

            • wolfshadowheart
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              I think their idea is that if you know a specific repacker like an athletic woman, compared to downloading softwares that could be uploaded by any elitists trying to fuck with you.

              In practice both are the same, but the reputation of the athletic woman makes her more trustworthy.

              However outside of that specific repacker I actually agree with you, it’s exactly the same lol.

              • @alexg_k@discuss.tchncs.deOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Interesting. If there are reputable packers / crackers, why do they not uses GPG to sign the software? That way, no one can manipulate and reupload the software.

  • @CapnAssHolo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    You’re thinking too technical about this. This is a money thing. Personally speaking pirated software/games were chicken soup for my poverty ridden childhood.

  • @Gush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    If i were to pay for an AutoCAD license , it would be over 200$ A MONTH

  • darcy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    really theres little reason to even use non-foss paid software…

    • @mtchristo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Unfortunalty most professional Autodesk software have no viable FOSS alternative (except Blender)

        • @mtchristo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I meant only blender is a solid contender to 3dsmax or Maya. Other Autodesk products like autocat. Civil 3d. And Revit don’t have any solid Open source alternative.

  • @Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    It’s one of those high-risk, high-returns case scenarios. You gamble. If you succeed, you will be saving some buck. Some software licences can be very, very expensive.

    There is no way of knowing the answer to your questions. You just use your intuition and take a leap of faith.

    • dejalynn
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      Some software licences can be very, very expensive.

      When I was in art school in the early 2000’s, I worked with computer controlled weaving looms. The program for drafting patterns and running the AVL Compu Dobby on the loom was free to download. In order to use it, though, you had to have a $3000 usb key.

        • dejalynn
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          The part that hurt was the ancient Mac II that ran the loom. When I encountered the Y2K bug on it, some upperclassmen said, “Oh we’ve just been turning the clock back a year.” Turned it back as far as it would go…1969