return2ozma@lemmy.worldBanned from community to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1386arrow-down10
arrow-up1386arrow-down1external-linkForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.worldBanned from community to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square59linkfedilink
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoYeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com be.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIf the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.
Yeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com be.
If the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.