Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前Square!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square136linkfedilinkarrow-up11.33Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.33Karrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前message-square136linkfedilink
minus-squareda_cow (she/her)@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up65·2 年前A square has all right angles inside the structure. This thing has two inside and two outside.
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 年前If you add that to the definition, you could still have a “square” with a segment of a circle connecting the edges in the middle
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 年前Then that section would be of a shorter length.
minus-squareAlinor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 年前But arent the ones from the circle 90 degrees on the inside of the circle as well? The squares could’ve just as well been placed on the other side of the (circle) lines.
minus-squareda_cow (she/her)@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 年前This is true, however now it has 4 inside and two outside the structure, so it now has something a square doesn’t has.
A square has all right angles inside the structure. This thing has two inside and two outside.
If you add that to the definition, you could still have a “square” with a segment of a circle connecting the edges in the middle
Then that section would be of a shorter length.
Ah, got me
But arent the ones from the circle 90 degrees on the inside of the circle as well? The squares could’ve just as well been placed on the other side of the (circle) lines.
This is true, however now it has 4 inside and two outside the structure, so it now has something a square doesn’t has.
Parallelogram.