• Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the Dems will have very little affect (if any) on anyone’s jebus or guns. So it’s really just the racism that’s the distinguishing factor.

        • Zachariah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s insane.

          And it’s far more likely that if the GOP had total control, they’d institute a national religion (good luck having your flavor picked for that one) and that they’d take away all the guns to protect their power (since there is clearly nothing they’d avoid doing if it meant getting/keeping power).

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The guns thing. There is a rather large swath of rural, liberal gun owners. If you’ve ever lived in a locale that lacks enough ambient light for you to see your hand in front of your face at night, you get it. If you live in a place where you can hear a car approaching from more than a mile away you get it.

      Let my handgun have a normal clip (average 9mm is 15 bullets) and we’re probably golden. And yet. DEMs lose moderate libs on this single issue.

      Yes, I own a handgun. Off the shelf with no mods it holds 18 per clip standard and comes with 2 clips.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have several. Not once have I actually felt like someone was coming to take them. Beto shot himself in the foot saying he would, especially in Texas.

          I like common sense gun laws. I took classes for my concealed carry. I can pass a test about the care and feeding of firearms any day of the week. No one except me has access to my guns.

          Of course I’m voting blue. They ain’t coming for my guns. And even if they were I’d still vote against Trump and fight them on it.

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ofc not, and yet this is a single issue that motivates people.

          He is a rapist. A coward. A traitor. A cluster B personality disorder. And now he’s fraying around the edges from old age. The stress can’t be helping his decline.

      • expr@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes a lot of sense for very rural living: you need a defense against the wild, and possibly hunting for food. I fully support that.

        The general desire among Democrats is stricter regulation, which is a very reasonable thing. People should be required to prove that they can be a responsible gun owner and are mentally fit to own one. I shouldn’t be able to pick one up from the sporting goods store like it’s a bag of potato chips. It is an incredibly powerful tool and can easily kill others. It should be treated as such.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I generally hear them water down the gun control, like a handgun with a stock number of bullets is generally ok. Or a rifle or shot gun. Unless you have some red flags, which you probably don’t have. Even in some of the stricter nations of gun control, there’s frequently some path for rural folks to at least have long guns.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Let’s not forget the group that’s voting 3rd party due to the situation in Israel. Does it make sense to do, no, but they will do it.

      I’ve tried to discuss it in the ML communities but as soon as you start proving your points with solid facts they just delete everything you said, censored and banned, a bit ironic.

  • Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every time some ridiculous shit like this happens, I remember when Howard Dean yelled a little too loud and that invalidated his entire political career.

    • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even worse, apparently we only got the audio from his mic and it was an appropriately loud EEEEAAAAGH given the audience volume

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        He went on to run the DNC on the platform of healthcare reform and was instrumental in getting Obama elected with a supermajority trifecta. And then he was fired and Lieberman got to kill the public option.

        He offered too much to maintain cultural hegemony.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been thinking this thought a lot lately. IIRC he was a decent man and likely would have been a decent president - but god forbid he get a little excited at a rally. Meanwhile, Trump has proven that literally nothing he could do or has done would change the mind of his voters. He could start and end every speech with a Howard Dean scream, and no one would even bat an eye.

       

      (And I seem to also recall hearing that the isolated microphone of his scream that we’ve all heard a hundred times did not reflect how it even sounded at the event.)

  • quink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this race…

    this race?

    The past three Republican presidents saw a job growth of 1 million, the past three Democratic presidents 51 million. Now sure, the president doesn’t define every aspect of the economy, but my god that big a discrepancy is not accidental. As someone not from America, I don’t understand why this race is so close, but why any race involving the Republicans, even outside of Trump, would be. I’ll consider Romney an exception though, but he doesn’t seem representative of the Republican Party before or after him.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      nearly all republicans rig elections to their favor and make decent education an expensive luxury to help maintain their control over poorly educated & informed voting masses and democrats let them since it makes their job easier and they know that there’s no viable alternative.

      the icing on this shit cake is that most democrat voters will shame you if you don’t participate and blame you if you can’t because of voter suppression.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzBannedBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        the icing on this shit cake is that most democrat voters will shame you if you don’t participate

        Drag is very surprised you find this odd. Democrat voters want you to fight back against Republican voter suppression. They think keeling over and giving up is a bad idea. The icing on the shit cake is that centrists who would rather have a D than an R choose to cooperate with Republican tactics.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the democrats are doing everything they can to lose. They don’t message well, and they keep running to the right.

      Most Americans want leftist policies, but the Democrats refuse to capitalize on that. Kamala is toting a right wing immigration bill thinking it’s going to help her.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because Trump is energizing his base with lies and propaganda designed to get them angry and motivated, while Kamala has squandered the enthusiasm her base had for her by pursuing disaffected center-right never-Trumpers. It’s basically the same strategy Hillary Clinton ran in 2016 and it’s terrifying to watch the Democrats gamble on it yet again.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      its because their corporate owners don’t want to have to implement left wing economic policies for the good of the nation. unfortunately we’ll continue to have fascist bogey men until people start holding dems accountable.

      • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s because the media, who teach most people how to think, is mostly owned by corporations who benefit from pro-corpo status quo policies.

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          media is just an amplifier. but yes you could make such an argument; though its deeper than that.

          • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Obviously it’s the sort of thing one could write doctoral theses about, but I reckon that much is not contentious.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s also the fact that this, “centrist liberal,” strategy worked exactly once in 1992 (and that may have had more to do with Ross Perot than anything else), but now there’s an entire pundit and strategist class built around it. Most of these people don’t mind losing elections if it means they can keep their jobs.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those semi-con swing voters are deciding this election though. Nobody else is “on the fence” right now.

      Jesus christ, we saw two assassination attempts on Trump and it didn’t change polls. While polls are trash and not to be trusted, they still would have changed if there was some large amount of moderate undecided voters.

      And lets not forget H. Clinton won the popular vote by millions of votes. Yes, the Dems are addicting to losing and make the worst decisions in order to appeal to the most useless people, but they’re also playing against a stacked deck here.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I broke this down in another comment, but there’s really no evidence that this moderate strategy will work. Democrats win when their base turns out, and they lose when their base isn’t motivated. Watching Harris campaign with Liz Cheney doesn’t motivate the base. They may pick up some moderate voters in PA (though, again, it didn’t work in 2016, so there’s no reason to think it will work now), but it’s not going to matter if she loses Michigan because of a hard-right position on Israel.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        but they’re also playing against a stacked deck here.

        that they’re helping perpetuate.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s entirely the EC.

    Biden won by ten million votes, and it was still a clencher because some idjit in kansas thinks the candidates sucking Pennsylvania’s fracking drill all election keeps their interests represented.

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    50% of people have below average intelligence and they finally feel represented… 🤷‍♂️

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have you seen some of the wishy-washy mouth breathers in the “undecided” focus groups? I’m embarrassed to admit we’re the same species. The Trump cultists might be insane, brain-poisoned, sociopathic, fundamentalist idiots but at least they have the capacity to make a bad decision. The independents can’t seem to make any decision. It if they do, it’s based on some random nonsense or impulse. I dunno if they’ve got learning disorders or are just sad windsocks, but the fact that they are the ones who get to decide if America dies next month is terrifying.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      wishy-washy mouth breathers in the “undecided” focus groups

      This website is deteriorating into Democrats insulting non-Democrats constantly.

      You’re party is simply unpopular as it caters to “moderates” and then has to spend an absurd amount of money to convince regular folks that the Democrats are the best those folks are allowed to have. No amount of memes and insults is going to change this simple truth.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re claiming to be undecided on Trump in 2024, you’re full of shit. If you claim to be a moderate but still can’t decide between Trump and Harris, you’re not a moderate, you’re just full of shit

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I haven’t claimed to be any of those things.

          Edit: On a second reading, I think you are talking about “moderates in general.” I truely don’t understand how either party plans out their platform, nor what attracts people to them. (Outside of perhaps Sanders, who made too much sense I guess.)

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Republicans don’t want the country to be educated.

    People with college degrees are overwhelmingly voting Harris. Republicans know that if we make the country smarter they’re screwed

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is with this elitist attitude about college? I’ve met plenty of idiots with degrees and many educated people without. I hate that we essentially say people are stupid if they didn’t go to college or university

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    The race is close because Republicans have built something better than a platform when you’re dealing with ignorant masses.

    They built a brand.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The electoral college takes it from a 45-55 to a 50-50. But what on God’s green earth gets him that 45% of the votes?

      • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        People who only loosely follow politics but liked the Obama economy that trump inherited and only watch Fox News. “He can’t possibly be worse than a demoncrat, he’s the same party as Reagan! It’s really sad how the media slanders him”

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you go by the polls, the two candidates are within margin of error of each other, or very close. We’re looking at a possibility that Trump would not only win the EC, but the overall popular vote, as well.

      The EC is not the only issue at play. Millions of Americans either like Trump or are willing to handwave his behavior away rather than vote for a Democrat.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No Republican has won the popular vote in 22 years, and that was because of 9/11. Before that, it was George Bush Sr. in 1988.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nope, we won’t. I say that because my claim is specifically that the EC is not the only thing going on. If the EC breaks with the popular vote next month, it still won’t be the only thing going on.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                We’re looking at a possibility that Trump would not only win the EC, but the overall popular vote, as well.

                You claimed that Trump might win the popular vote, and that’s very, very unlikely (but not impossible). That’s the only part I was referring to.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also because big business owns all the media and everyone can lie without consequences. Democracy can’t survive in these conditions.

  • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty sure it’s the economy. Despite the fact that the US economy has been reasonably well managed, by international standards, people are hurting – which is the perfect recipe for changing the governing party. Telling people that things aren’t as bad as they think they are makes you sound out of touch.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Political Memes (and Politics) community when asked about each party’s Kamala’s views on genocide.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or any recent administration, including the current one that could be contacted and complained to. Or honestly most any of the western world’s leading powers. Yes, the US is a big problem because of their supplying arms, but when it comes to the meme of blinders on, they are not the only ones who are pretending this will fix itself.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no, only Biden/Harris! Well, and Obama and W to a lesser degree. But Trump? He gets a free pass don’t-cha know! Because of course he will save all the Palestinians and Lebanese people if he wins!

        (obligatory /s for those who don’t get it)

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also conservatives when asked about the same and Russia/Ukraine and school shootings.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most people are poorer today in the day-to-day than they were 4 years ago.

    That’s why. It’s that simple.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        American voters do seem to have very short memories.

        Even faced with actual data that indicates that the economy has consistently performed better under Democrats over the past 75 years, they still pretend that the party of the oligarchs is somehow going to solve the problems of the working class.

        Donald Trump is very open about his own anti-labor policies as an employer, yet the very people who hate being screwed over by their bosses worship him.

        I don’t understand how anyone can function with this level of cognitive dissonance.

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t care what any data report says, and neither does anyone else. It means nothing if my grocery bill has doubled and I have to start worrying if I’m going to have enough to eat for the week.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For the same reason I got temp banned from this community. People only need to be slightly against the circlejerk to be pushed away from a community, and this creates a “well, might as well let everything burn” counter-resentment. I can’t vote in the US, but part of that reason is having prioritized society and consequences over ego and money. if I could I would vote against Trump, but it seems you guys are stuck doing it, and you reap what you sow. Stop being surprised pikachu-faced.