• Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fortran is still a good language for some purposes I think.

    And I feel the same way, C++ tries to solve the problem of having too many features by adding more features.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t get me wrong. There is still a time and a place for Fortran. And this will also likely always be the case for C++. But I’m not sure it is entirely wise to choose it if you’re creating a new project anymore.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 years ago

          A lot of computational heavy tasks for science were done in Fortran at least ten years ago (and I think still are). I was told that’s mainly because Fortran has a good deal of libraries for just that, and it was widely taught in academia so this is a common ground between the older and newer generations.

          I think it may be gradually superseded by Python, but I don’t know if it is

          • Troy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            A lot of the underlying libraries in python are actually written in Fortran (or were when they were conceived, and the Fortran components later replaced). Numpy, for example, was originally pretty much a wrapper on top of BLAS and LAPACK.