• Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why do you support terrorists?

    The Empire has a right to defend itself

    Those Rebel Terrorists were using human shields

    The ones responsible for the destruction of Alderaan were those Rebel Terrorists, we gave a very humane 30 minute evacuation warning after all

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rebels destroyed Alderaan with their own superweapon they had been developing underground. The Imperial Navy is the most moral force in the galaxy.

      OK, the Death Star did fire on Alderaan, but it was a targeted, focused strike that hit a rebel facility which caused their superweapon to explode and destroy the planet, the Empire had no idea that would happen. The Imperial Navy is the most moral force in the galaxy.

      OK, the Death Star did destroy the planet, but the rebels were still developing a superweapon and even more people would’ve died otherwise. The Imperial Navy is the most moral force in the galaxy.

      OK, the rebels weren’t developing a superweapon on Alderaan, but the destruction of the planet were the actions of a rogue moff acting without approval. The Imperial Navy is the most moral force in the galaxy.

      OK, the Emperor’s right hand man was in the room when it was decided, but Emperor Palpatine has invited every surviving Alderaanian to his own private resort world, and they’re also rebuilding with a new colony on Ejolus. The Imperial Navy is the most moral force in the galaxy.

      OK, the colony on Ejolus has been wiped out, but they were harboring rebels. The Imperial Navy is the most moral force in the galaxy.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know Vader choked the life out of the last person who questioned him, but I haven’t seen Leia do enough challenging media interviews.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    ‘Princess’ establishment chosen Lyin’ Leiyah is clearly just trying to turn the empire back into the corrupt old Republic and force everyone to accept all aliens including the despicable Gran who don’t deserve rights because they don’t look or act like me. I heard she was even there when Alderaan was destroyed and did nothing.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vader’s death Star may be pointing right at Yavin 4, but Leia doesn’t want to support the rights of Yavin 4 natives so they’re the same

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Death Stars don’t kill people. Traitors who won’t give up the location of the secret Rebel base kill people.

  • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I must have missed the part of the movie where Leia devotes a significant amount of her planets resources to building the deathstar while her constituents screamed for her to stop

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      Evidently you did, because it’s mentioned that she was a member of the Imperial Senate right up till it was dissolved. She participated directly in the government that built a weapon of mass destruction and used it to commit a genocidal act of state terrorism. Thankfully, a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, they never invented purity testing so people like you weren’t wrenching their spines in an effort to suck their own dicks about it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        She was still in the senate when her ship was captured by Vader at the beginning of Star Wars.

        Leia: I’m a member of the Imperial Senate on a diplomatic mission to Alderaan.

        Vader: You are part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor.

          • zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Michelle Obama made a speech on this. Trump is not getting demands. She is.

            Mr Concept of a Plan after 8 years isn’t pushed at all. Meanwhile, we need more details on the articulated plans of Harris. It’s quite the mismatched standard.

            Also, Biden is her boss. She’s not the boss yet. New bosses do different things with the company when they take over.

            • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              And they don’t publicly undercut the old bosses while being second in charge especially in sensitive diplomatic situations.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                1 year ago

                Exactly. Maybe Harris is in lockstep with Biden on Israel or maybe it would just be a really bad idea to undercut him while she needs his support.

                Who knows? We won’t know until she’s actually in charge.

                I’m old enough to remember that Al Gore didn’t rock the Clinton boat either. I doubt he would have been another Bill Clinton.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Who knows? We won’t know until she’s actually in charge.

                  Trump Harris is just saying that to appease the Deep State Zionist voters, but once they’re in office, they’ll reveal that it was all an act and they’re actually going to do all the stuff we want. Trust the plan.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            She was working in government with the intention of making things better

            She was literally working for an armed rebellion actively fighting a war with the aim of overthrowing the government.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clearly, the solution is to vote in the Imperial Senate if you want to affect change.

        Unless you’re trying to say Kamala Harris is secretly working for Hamas or something?

      • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well you would have to have a spine to know what thats like so I understand why the people bravely tonguing the asshole of the administration lying to us and circumventing Congress to continue arming their pet dictator’s ethnic cleansing wouldn’t get it

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe if you plugged away at it for a while you could come up with an even more flaccid and contrived rebuttal.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see that you understand that, much like a vice president, that is something someone with the powers of a princess can do.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this analogy, did Princess Leia build the Death Star and blow up Alderaan? Ridiculous levels of whitewashing.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope and nope.

      Guess who’s ringing up Netanyahu telling him not to agree authenticity the ceasefire? Yes, that’s right, the nation’s most popular insurrectionist and peace hater, Donald J Trump, and guess whose geriatric genocidal actions were not mentioned by you at all in a heroic act of something I’m sure psychologists have a name for, yes that’s right, it’s that loony loopy idtiot former president, losing his marbles in public on the television, yes, it’s two for two, good old (well, ok, old at least), Donald J Trump!

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think Biden needs Trump’s approval to stop sending Netanyahu weapons?

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think Trump has been ringing up Netanyahu regularly to argue against Israel agreeing to Biden’s ceasefire plan, like he said he is, so Trump is working to keep the genocide in Gaza going and you can’t bring yourself to admit this or talk about it while Trump felt admits it and even boasts of it in public.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll admit it right now. Not that it matters why Netanyahu is refusing to negotiate.

            You seem to be under the impression that “negotiation” means “asking nicely and giving up if they say no.” If Netanyahu refuses to cooperate, you stop giving him weapons until he does. Obviously. How bad do you have to be at negotiating to not realize that?

            • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d imagine they have enough munitions and suppliers for it not to matter, and doing so will simply deteriorate relations, causing the US to hold less sway with its one ally in the region.

              Nah, that’s too nuanced - just don’t give them guns and they’ll stop.

              • TrueTomBombadil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It doesn’t really matter what you imagine. It’s worked before and I bet it’ll work again. And even if it doesn’t and Israel is entirely independent from the US and totally needs nothing from us… Why is that a reason to supply them. Great they don’t need our shit let’s stop giving it to em.

                Hold less sway with an ally… What good is that sway of we can’t stop a genocide with it? Or really slow it down even a pinch? I’d rather people doing genocide don’t like us actually… They’re evil.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you admit that Trump is actively working to prolong the genocide in Gaza and then you ignore that and come straight back with your weird logic that the people who are trying to stop him are culpable and the people trying to get him to kill more gets a pass from you, and you want me to believe you care about Gaza?! You do not, you’re just cynically using it as a political football to try and win the election for stupid, senile and angry old man Donald “finish them” “best king of Israel” Trump.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So you believe that Biden should be completely immune to all criticism no matter what he does so long as he’s not Trump? I should just invent a fantasy world where Biden is perfect the way you do because acknowledging reality might hurt Kamala’s chances? If I was interested in doing that, then I would’ve done it with the beliefs I was raised with, and I’d be a religious conservative. Fortunately, I’m willing to think critically and face reality, instead of putting party above truth, as you seem to be suggesting I do right now. I want no part in any group or political ideology that requires me to lie or ignore the truth.

                Keep repeating that conspiracy theory to yourself all you want. Ad hominem is the only response you libs can ever muster. You can’t refute what I actually say, so you just focus on trying to paint me as a secret Trump supporter. Weak.

                • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not ad hominem to point out that all of your criticisms are for the Democrats and you can barely muster half a sentence of admission that trump might not be the savior of Gaza you’re implying, and that your whole argument is politically biased against the Democrats and for the republicans.

                  If you don’t want to be accused of being a trump supporter, at least make some effort towards even a tiny bit of balance. But no, you can’t do it. For you, any factual criticism of trump and the republicans must be countered by a wall of conspiracy theory about how Biden’s attempts to negotiate peace are secretly war mongering and trump’s open and boastful war mongering is swept under the carpet.

          • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why can’t both be true? Sure. Trump tells Netanyahu not to accept the ceasefire. And when Netanyahu says no, rather than doing something to further pressure him, like making the munitions we send them conditional on a ceasefire, he just gives up and sends more bombs.

            We’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of options! We asked him nicely to stop and he told us no. :(

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              One of two people will be president next: Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. It’s very important for the people of Gaza that it’s Kamala, not Trump. It’s a literal binary choice that the country faces. And then there’s the denying healthcare to women of childbearing age, the mass deportations, the plan to be dictator on day one, all of project 2025, the plan to send the military against leftwingers for disagreeing with Trump, all apart from the simping, fawning and sucking up to every dictator Trump can wheedle an appointment with and who has the nous to realise Trump will love them forever just for calling him clever or strong in public. I used to think that Putin had some compromat on Trump that kept him doing his bidding, but it became painfully obvious that that’s not needed, and Putin just needs to whisper in his ear that he’s a great leader and everyone respects him, and Trump is bought, yes, all that cheaply.

              • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I 100% agree with you on everything in this comment. My only point is that regardless of how badly trump wants to finish the job, Harris certainly doesn’t seem to want to stop it. And as such, she isn’t free from criticism. Moreover she needs to hear more criticism to push her into walking back her support of Israel “defending itself” by retaliating in a wildly disproportionate fashion. And the key time to do it was in the lead up to the election, because if she felt like enough people were upset about it that it could cost her the election, it had a higher chance of making a difference.

                It’s possible to believe Trump is an evil piece of shit, but also that Harris needs to improve. Just because she’s the better choice doesn’t mean she’s perfect.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nope and nope.

      Guess who’s ringing up Netanyahu telling him not to agree authenticity the ceasefire? Yes, that’s right, the nation’s most popular insurrectionist and peace hater, Donald J Trump, and guess whose geriatric genocidal actions were not mentioned by you at all in a heroic act of something I’m sure psychologists have a name for, yes that’s right, it’s that loony loopy idtiot former president, losing his marbles in public on the television, yes, it’s two for two, good old (well, ok, old at least), Donald J Trump!

        • JonsJava@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey. Moderator here. Your attack on their intelligence is a rule violation. Please either delete this comment, or update it so you’re not insulting somebody. If you don’t in 2 hours, I will be forced to delete your comment. If you continue down this path, you will receive a temporary ban.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          (I deleted that comment because I accidentally posted it twice. It’s one of the other replies to your post.)

          NYT thinks Israel has a massive stockpile of weapons, other suppliers and actually recently exported a record value of arms in the year containing the October 7 attack and the insane obliterative war that Israel launched in response. I don’t think Israel is worried about running out of weapons any time soon, because they’ve opened up another front against Lebanon!

          You know who could stop the war today? Netanyahu. Do you know who’s telling him not to stop on the phone, on a regular basis? Trump. He even boasts of it.

          taken in… grade A moron… you’re dumb.

          I don’t appreciate being called names just because you disagree with me, and I don’t think it strengthens your case that you resort to that as a debating tactic.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not disagreeing with you about a matter of opinion or ideology. I’m disagreeing with you on a matter of basic critical thinking and awareness of the material reality of the situation. On the former you have a point. On the latter it’s a disservice to the overall discourse to give you so much grace as to not call you an idiot. Your views on this matter are not valid and there is a correct answer.