• claycle
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I am surprised no one yet has posted the infuriatingly worthless expression of affectless sympathy:

    thoughts and prayers

  • KING
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”

    Both my two-time-car-crash-survivor self with severe PTSD and my breast-cancer-surviving mom (who had to get her boobs chopped off) fucking hate that phrase with a passion. There are some times I have to walk across an intersection and just start crying right there because I’m so terrified. I want to kick the nuts off of whoever came up with that phrase.

  • @Navarian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Unsure if this counts as a quote but here goes.

    If you can’t handle me at my worst, you don’t deserve me at my best

    Absolute fucking nonsense.

  • umbraklat
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    My least favorite is

    Just be yourself!

    Even in grade school I knew this was hogwash. I didn’t act the same in class as during recess, or in church as when at the dinner table. Exactly which me was I supposed to be? When someone asks, “What am I supposed to do?” They are really asking, “How should I behave?” And if you’ve never been on a date before, or this is your first job interview, then it’s not obvious.

    A: “So, how did the interview go?”

    B: “Not so well, he threw my resume away, in front of me, and ordered me to leave.”

    A: “What? Why?”

    B: “Well, I did just as your said, I was being myself. I walked in, gave him the ol’ finger guns, then started with my best fart joke.”

    A: “Why the hell would you do that at an interview?”

    B: “Because that routine always slays in the dorms and I was trying to be myself.”

    • @31415926535@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Anybody on the autism spectrum just laughs sadly, shakes head quietly, when told ‘just be your self’

    • @ELI70@lemmy.run
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      ask yourself: is it possible to be anybody else? no? then this saying is non-nonsensical!

      • umbraklat
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I don’t know, as a ttrpg’er, I’m being someone else every two weeks for three hours are a time. ;)

  • @31415926535@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Namaste. Anyone I’ve met who uses that word has always turned out to be a preachy, holier than thou, self involved tool.

  • @deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    “The customer is always right” conveniently missing the second part: “…in matters of taste and style”.

    Also misinterpreting “customer” as an individual rather than as the aggregate of customer demand.

  • Freeman
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “We only use x% of our brain.”

    Simply not true as shown since years by neurology

    • @Waker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      This reminds me of the “you eat X amount of spiders in your sleep every year”. It’s also been debunked so many times and I see it popping up from time to time.

      Even more ironic, this was created by some professor (?) to prove that starting fake viral facts was easy or something…

      • @MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Man, I always thought that one was suspect. If I eat 10 per year and have been alive 40+ years, then surely one of those times I would have woken up.

  • @maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    “You can’t have your cake and eat it too”. What is the flaming point of having cake if you can’t eat it?

    • @PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      One time I baked a whole entire cake for myself. There was no occasion or anything I just wanted to have a cake and eat it too. It turns out cakes are really big and it’s really hard for a single person to eat a cake faster than it turns all spongy and icky.

    • umbraklat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I wondered about this for years and years, never understanding, especially, since “having cake” and “eating cake” are used interchangeably. But, I finally figured it out! In this sense, the “having” is equivalent to “keeping” or “being in possession of.”

      Examples:

      • “What’s it like having a Mercedes Benz?”
      • “The Smiths have a very nice home.”

      No eating implied!

      Therefore, the saying is more inline with “You can’t keep (to show off or admire) your cake, and eat it, too.”

  • @arcrust@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Not see it. But I hear this one.

    “it’s always in the last place you look”

    No shit Sherlock. Why would I keep looking after I found it?

    • @philluminati@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What people really mean when they say this is

      it’s in the last place you think to look

      This again is a misnomer because, not just because you stop looking… but because people find it hard to admit things are lost. All part of the half serious, half ridiculous psuedo science of Findology (disclaimer: my own blog)

  • Bady
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    “Survival of the fittest” (when used without trying to understand its actual meaning).

      • Lvxferre
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        This is from Darwin, I think. It describes the mechanism of selection in evolution: the organisms that are better adapted to their environments are the ones more likely to survive.

        Bady likely hates it because it’s often misused, by transforming it in a prescriptive statement (from “the fittest survives” to "the fittest deserves to survive) and/or ignoring that what’s considered the fittest depends on the environment (e.g. a fish isn’t fit in a dry environment, but a cactus isn’t fit in the sea).

        • Thelsim
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          Worse, he probably refers to social darwinism.
          A very nasty school of thought that’s (partly) responsible for everything from genocide to eugenics.

          • Lvxferre
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Social “Darwinism” relies on the fallacy that I mentioned, where you treat a descriptive statement as if it was prescriptive. (And yes, it’s nasty.)

  • @derivator@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Oh sweet summer child

    Yeah we get it, we’ve all seen Game of Thrones, too. If you have to be a condescending dick, at least be original.