Summary

In October 2020, Samuel Paty, a French teacher, was murdered following a false accusation by a 13-year-old student who claimed he’d shown anti-Muslim bias. The girl had made up the story to cover the fact she had been suspended from school for bad behaviour.

In reality, Paty’s lesson on free speech included optional viewing of Charlie Hebdo cartoons, but he hadn’t excluded anyone. The student’s story triggered a social media campaign led by her father, who, along with others, is now on trial for inciting hatred and connections to Paty’s attacker, an 18-year-old radicalized Chechen.

The school will be named the Samuel Paty School from next year.

  • Carvex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will be a glorious day in the name of Humans when we finally dump the dumb shit and act like we control our own actions and future

      • MelastSB@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        1 year ago

        … If there were no rules you’d rape animals? Maybe you should go to church, but don’t pretend we’re all like you

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are rules the only thing keeping you from raping animals right now? Because that says more about you than the rest of the world.

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. Not all rules come from imaginary gods
        2. Most people don’t need rules to keep them from harming others
        • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. Then where do they come from, if there’s no objective morality.

          2. Not true, abortion is becoming rampant because political factions are trying to change a moral fact. Nazi Germany also attacked the Church and started allowing the dehumanisation of Jews through secularism.

            • 2xar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              His point about Nazi’s attacking the Church is also blatantly false BTW. Nazi’s had a bit of a conflict with the Catholic church at the beginning, but they quickly reconciled and pretty much enabled them. Nazi’s also created their own version of Christianity, the biggest difference to other branches being that they claimed Jesus wasn’t actually jew, but of Aryan descent, and Hitler was the new Messiah:

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity

          • nyctre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Morality comes from the simple shit such as “I don’t like that…maybe I shouldn’t do it to others!” And stuff like “we’re stronger together”. Which even the creatures with tiny brains have managed to figure out before you. Congratulations.

          • 2xar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Religious morality keeps changing as well. A few hundred years ago according to Christianity it was morally right to use black people as slaves, because they had no souls. Luckily, society has progressed and gradually it became immoral to enslave people all over the world. In the end, Christianity had no choice but to accept this - although it took some wars to convince them everywhere about it.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that raping animals is illegal is not the reason I don’t rape animals. If the only thing stopping you from committing horrific crimes is a belief in the sky man then I suggest you remove yourself from the general population (become a hermit) so us normal people don’t have to worry about you losing faith in your invisible friend and going berserk at a petting zoo.

      • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Humans already rape animals on an industrial scale. That’s what artificial insemination is. Religion didn’t stop that.

      • ikidd@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d hoped this was missed sarcasm then I checked the profile. Its verifiable stupidity.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Or people commit genocide because of a command from an entity we just assume is the source of all morality and therefore their actions and commands cannot be immoral by definition.

          • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            We can have a discussion about the moral frameworks where that would be wrong but an absolute moral giver allows for no such discussion.

              • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Interpretation can be possible, but often the driver doesn’t seem to be a genuine seeking of a moral truth but working backwards to avoid morally unpalatable conclusions or outright cherry picking and ignoring certain parts of a text. I see that as a tacit admission that morals don’t actually come from the text itself but maybe there’s something I’m missing as I’m far from an expert.

                  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I agree with you on this one for sure. That’s one of the reasons I think that a text is not a particularly good foundation for an absolute system of morals. I don’t know why we need to mess around with interpretations in that case.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lol make sure to check out this guys posting history for more zany fun, this is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this guys animal rape fantasies