Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agoNone. Suffer.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up1977arrow-down10
arrow-up1977arrow-down1imageNone. Suffer.lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 years agomessage-square114linkfedilink
minus-squareKazuyaDarklight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·2 years agoYes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.
minus-squarehddsx@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 years agoAre you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake? That… seems like a bad solution
Yes which is part of why the major chains are owned and controlled by companies, but then that makes the whole thing pointless. IMO, a company controlled blockchain may as well just be a DB cluster, it would be faster and more efficient.
Are you saying that they “solve” that by never giving up more than 49% stake?
That… seems like a bad solution