awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Global News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 year ago

Denmark announces major boost to Greenland defense amid Trump threats

www.rawstory.com

external-link
message-square
70
link
fedilink
181
external-link

Denmark announces major boost to Greenland defense amid Trump threats

www.rawstory.com

BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Global News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
70
link
fedilink
A massive increase in defense spending is set to hit Greenland in a move that would allow the Artic territory to fortify its military’s strength.The announcement came just hours after President-elect Donald Trump again insisted that the United States should acquire the semi-autonomous part of Denmar...

A massive increase in defense spending is set to hit Greenland in a move that would allow the Artic territory to fortify its military’s strength.

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20241225164949/https://www.rawstory.com/greenland-2670671719/

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawstory.com%2Fgreenland-2670671719%2F

  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Death to NATO. Its an objectively good thing for humanity. I don’t care if your boogey man also wants it, its a good thing

    • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d prefer not to be at war with Russia, thanks

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just bc you aren’t on the battle field doesn’t mean you aren’t at war with Russia. The US and NATO are just using Ukrainians to fight their war

        • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russia could end this fight any day it wants.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            By leaving and ceasing all military action, right? And what would happen the next day?

            • Gloomy@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What would happen the next day?

              • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                The resumed and emboldened massacre of eastern Ukranians by the banderite coup government, same as the decade that led up to this, except without even the tissue-thin veneer of western disapproval

                • Gloomy@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You mean of Russian-Backed separatists?

                  https://web.archive.org/web/20230323083343/https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/documents/publications/mh17/map/2023/report-mh17

                  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes, exactly. The Eastern Ukranians who got sick of being terrorized by marauding Azovites and petitioned Russia for protection will be slaughtered wholesale, man woman and child, and your only response is “well they shouldn’t have thrown in with the orcs for protectionsmuglord” Perhaps the US-backed nazi government shouldn’t have spent ten years murdering them with no repercussions then? Just a thought.

                    Clearly, a government being aligned with Bad Country for any reason is enough for you to turn off your empathy completely. It’s no wonder you’re on the side of the goose-steppers and SS-applauders.

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolute clown

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because Ukrainians don’t have agency and only want to keep their own culture and language because some empire tells them to /s

          • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say that at all

            You can both be exploited and have agency. The actions of the Ukrainian government also does not reflect the will of its people anymore to be clear.

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Too late

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’re in the US, you already are lol

        But I’m not sure what that has to do with the fact that NATO should be dissolved

        • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not in the US

          It has to do with the fact that my country exists because NATO protects it. Russia violates our airspace regularly.

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            my country exists because NATO protects it.

            Then “your country” shouldn’t exist. Its just a US vassal at that point anyway

            • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              As opposed to the Russian vassal it would’ve been if not?

              • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                Far better if the NATO backed coup that dissolved the USSR hadn’t happened

                • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  k man

                  All Russia has to do is stop being aggressive to its neighbors and NATO will automatically start falling apart. NATO support before Russia invaded Ukraine was decreasing.

                  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There would probably be a manufactured excuse to keep it around. It seems like that’s already happening with the hyping up of a potential conflict with China.

                  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    All Russia has to do is stop being aggressive to its neighbors and NATO will automatically start falling apart

                    Then why was it that when the Russian Federation asked to join NATO back in the 90’s they were refused?

                    What about when the Soviet Union asked to join back in like '48 was it denied?

                    Because it exists to be aggressive toward designated enemies of the US

                  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    America and 18 other countries invaded Russia in 1918 to restore the monarchy, kicking off a century of relentless aggression. They aren’t the ones who started this cycle and they’re not the ones with the power to stop it. We are.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which country is that

        • Linktank@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like that you’re sharing your opinion. I just want more information about it, so I can either agree or disagree. What about dissolving NATO would be “Good for humanity”?

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considerimg what’s literally happening right now, literally today, that’s a pretty hot take.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Considering NATO has been an enemy to humanity since its creation, its about as cold of a take as you can get

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What is literally happening right now, literally today that you think should change people’s minds about not supporting nazis?

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Millions of Ukrainians spending Christmas day without powered due to 70 missile attack from an aggressive neighbour.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I want to make very, very sure you read my entire comment. People spending Christmas without power is all it takes for you to put on the armband and throw your support behind the “gas em all 1488 racial holy war now” faction and become an enemy of like 98% of humanity? If so, incredible unprompted mask drop. Like, for real? Because that and worse happens in war all the time dude. You don’t see me growing a little tiny mustache just because I think Dresden was overkill. Would that have been enough to turn you into a hitlerite back then too?

      • TheBroodian [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        NATO is literally a Nazi organization

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      NATO is just one manifestation of military industrial complex. Just getting rid of it without any global change it would be net negative for the humanity.

      The primary issue with NATO is that it’s often misused by US for its own personal needs.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        The primary purpose of NATO is to maintain western hegemony over the global south to better extract resources and profit from it. It being gone is a net good

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, the primary issue I mention is the purpose you are talking about. Thank you for repeating what I said. It being disbanded wouldn’t automatically be net positive, since despite the issues it creates, it does serve other valid purposes. You need to address systemic issues, not manifestations of those issues to solve anything. Because if not NATO, it would be another 4 letter organization doing exactly the same thing by exactly the same people.

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            it does serve other valid purposes

            Name one

            • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago
              • Standardization of military equipment and protocols, so that each NATO country can operate the same equipment without needing re-training.
              • Unified communication infrastructure for instant information sharing during wartime period.
              • Protection from Russia’s imperialism and stated goal of reunification of former USSR territories.
              • Containment of Germany following their demilitarization.
              • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                1 year ago

                How is any of that positive for humanity?

                • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Because any war leads to human losses, so prevention of war is a good thing, not bad.

                  • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    NATO does not prevent war. The term “defensive pact” is bullshit. NATO has always been a geopoltical aggressor. Its an appendage if US empire

              • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You are not describing other purposes, you are describing means by which NATO pursues it’s one purpose. Also, what is your understanding of the word “imperialism”?

                • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yet another lib who thinks imperialism means expanding territory/any invasion

                  • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Obviously things are imperialism when Russians do them. Imps are closely related creatures to orcs and goblins.

                • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Protection from Russia’s imperialism and stated goal of reunification of former USSR territories.

                  Should be self-explanatory.

                  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not. What is your understanding of the word “imperialism”?

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Name one negative consequence of the dissolution of NATO

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://lemmy.zip/comment/15535240

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            ? But your precious NATO already exists and thats happening lol

    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ask the Poles how the Soviets treated them

      Don’t trust the Poles? Ask any number of victim countries brutalized.

      That ‘boogeyman’ ex-KGB is doing it today to Ukraine…

Global News@lemmy.zip

globalnews@lemmy.zip

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !globalnews@lemmy.zip

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.

Country prefix

Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities
  • !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
  • !technology@lemmy.zip - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
  • !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
  • !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com - News and information about Europe.
  • !usa@midwest.social - News and information about United States of America.

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 372 users / day
  • 1.44K users / week
  • 3.7K users / month
  • 7.52K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 6.4K subscribers
  • 11.4K Posts
  • 20.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org