• @mogranja@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    363 months ago

    I want the stuff, the stuff is there. I take it. The stuff is still there, nothing was lost, nothing was stolen.

    • @Celestus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      You’re not stealing stuff, you’re stealing revenue. The missing revenue is what they care about. But they have plenty of that already, so they can get bent

      • @corvus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        153 months ago

        Stealing revenue it’s hypothetical, because it supposes that you were going to pay for the product if it wasn’t available pirated. And that is far from being certain.

        • @Celestus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          That is very true, but that doesn’t stop them from going after piracy to protect the revenue

      • @leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Not really, it’s just free publicity.

        Unless their product is shit, of course, and no one would pay for it after trying or recommend it to others… in which case, fuck them, they deserve it for attempting to sell shit.

  • Random Dent
    link
    fedilink
    English
    333 months ago

    I bought a quite expensive piece of animation software (that cost over $1000) to use professionally. The specific term it was sold to me under was a “perpetual license.” I took this to mean “never ending”, which is the dictionary definition of the word “perpetual.” You can probably guess where this is going.

    A few years later, in the middle of a professional project, it stopped working. I contacted support, and was told that they changed the way they were doing licenses so I’d have to buy a new one (at almost double the price) or eat shit. I’m paraphrasing, but that was the gist of it.

    So yeah, if you’re thinking of buying a Toon Boom Harmony perpetual license, maybe save yourself a lot of money and hassle and just pirate it instead. Or tell them to get fucked and use their direct competitor. I have done both.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Honestly, I don’t have any issue using a pirated software for my own personal use.

    I put the line where you use the software to make money.

    • @explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      Even then, I have no problem with self-employed people using it to make money. But if a corporation you work for does it: snitch and get that BSA payday.

  • CodexArcanum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    193 months ago

    Can purchasing anything within the system of monstrous exploitation called global capitalism be justified?

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      No unless you lack self respect

      Corporate is your enemy and paying them money is funding your own oppression

      • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        No, but saying to participate and that purchasing software is inherently moral is also fallacious.

        Developers, musicians, creatives, actors etc all need to be paid to live in society. However, the current system rewards the lucky few and large corporations as well as the non creative side of media and software creation.

          • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            No, but that’s the case with or without piracy. Artists and devs shouldn’t rely on goodwill. That’s just expanding the tips system which is already awful.

              • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                No, I’m not saying artist money is any more immoral than any other purchase. I’m also saying artists should not depend on donations only. I also did not say I exclusively pirate. Don’t put words in my mouth.

                I’m saying the current system is broken. Replacing it with tips is not the solution. Transport and creative industries will see huge lay offs in the coming years. We need to decide as a society what we value. Is it creating art and pleasure or lines going up on company spreadsheets. Free spread of ideas and art is an ideology. The only reason not to allow it is to profit. Those profits don’t go to most artists.

  • @Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    173 months ago

    I am not stealing. It’s there, I take it and it’s still there. Don’t know why these posts keep popping up in piracy communities. Same plague was there on reddit too. Like seriously it’s 2025.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      Corpos are not people, they deserve nothing, they are entitled to nothing.

      I don’t care what the government has to say on this issue. Useless fucking whores.

    • ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      We reject the premise of the question: the onus sits with copyright holders to justify copyright protection.

  • Engywook
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    There is nothing to justify.

    I pirate because I want to see the world burn, among other things.

  • Venia Silente
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Everyone has already given their response so there’s nothing really to add other than, well, there’s lots of reasons to justify piracy. Most of them are even provided by the publishers / distributors themselves!

    Also it’s weird to browse the top 10 responses or even below, and NOT see this xkcd posted or even linked. What is going on, Lemmy?