The futuristic city with flying cars at the beginning of the movie definitely has all the cyberpunk visuals, and technically Zorg is the head of an evil corporation. But the real villain of the movie is incoming force of evil/darkness. And the plot is resolved through the power of love. Even the President of Earth is actively trying to help do the right thing and save the planet.

While there are some great cyberpunk visuals at the beginning of the movie, I don’t know if the themes are there to call this cyberpunk. What do you think? Would you consider The Fifth Element to be cyberpunk?

Here’s a trailer. It’s currently streaming on Hulu.

  • Corroded@leminal.spaceEnglish
    1·
    2 years ago

    I typically view cyberpunk as a world dressing that acts more as a backdrop and I think The Fifth Element fits it pretty well.

    I feel like the rest of it kind of just layers on. Kind of like the game Cloudpunk. It’s set in a futuristic dystopian world that reminds me a lot of Blade Runner but feels a lot like a mystery and adventure game. The cyberpunk aspect doesn’t feel like it’s the most notable part.

    • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      0·
      2 years ago

      This is a very fair take on the whole genre influence thing. More aesthetic similarities yet less story mechanics that are found to define genres. Let’s give open creativity a chance before we stick some label on that produces low effort drudgery.

      • Corroded@leminal.spaceEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        Exactly. It reminds me of high versus low fantasy. I feel like when other themes are mixed in it makes the story feel more familiar and the world more grounded. It’s definitely possible to have cyberpunk out in front and above all else but I prefer when it isn’t forced into that position.

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    1·
    2 years ago

    It’s not not cyberpunk.

    It’s close enough and shares enough of the same things to be analyzed as part of the genre.

    I do think that to a large extent the big evil bowling ball of doom is supposed to abstractly represent capital or something adjacent.

    Things like the depiction of the indigenous resistance movement as unsophisticated dupes and terrorists merits analysis; why did the French director depict them this way? How can this be a reflection of French colonial history? Same with the depiction of the white Archeologists and the presumably middle easter kid subjected to colonialism in the beggining though I think there’s less there.

    Leelu can be analyzed through the “born sexy yesterday” trope and there’s a lot of questions to ask from a Feminist slant.

    The movie actually acknowledges some of the harms and contradictions of capitalism, while underplaying others. Showing the relationship between Corben as a cabby working for Zorg and ultimately being one of the people who thwarts Zorg is nice.

    The decision to never have the protagonists and the antagonists directly interact is a neat one and opens up some very good questions about narrative norms - turns out the hero doesn’t actually need to confront the villain!

    It does have a lot of cyberpunk themes; mighty and powerful corporations and governments can’t save themselves so they need a working class guy and his weird buddies to save the world. The upper classes are depicted as a gaggle of decadent idiots who have no idea what’s happening, while the corporate leader is a hyper-competent bastard who completely understands all the harm his sytem causes and loves it.

    And it’s also just a silly adventure film with lots of style and cool visuals and a sappy power of love resolution.