• Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty much anything that you’ve ever owned has been made from the exploitation of some working class somewhere. The clothes you wear. The house you live in. The electronics that you use. The furniture that you own. The very food you eat and drink is often cheap because of an exploited worker somewhere that’s paid pennies on the dollar. Your going to draw the line at a drastically cheaper car that’s leaps and bounds better for the environment than a petrol vehicle? Okay.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes.

      EVs are definitely better for the environment than ICE powered cads. But they won’t singlehandedly solve climate change, let alone all the harms when places prioritize single occupancy passenger cars at the expense of public transit.

      And sure, I’m drawing a line here because cars are one of the precious few industries where you can still buy union-made.

      Where do you draw that line?

    • Daelsky@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      To be fair, as someone said, it’s not EV that will save the environment. They bring their own problems such as rare earth minerals, heavy metals, lithium fires, heavier cars = move road degradation because of weight, more PM2,5 because of the weight on caoutchouc tires, the difficulty to replace parts when broken because of the more locked design and less right to repair friendly and more.

      Are they good for the environment? More than a combustion car, probably. Are they the silver bullet solution? Absolutely not. We are in Canada and we have industries, local, that could benefit from investing into public transportation and trains. That’s true Canadian investment to our companies and solutions to the current environmental crisis.