Its been some time since xitter, reddit, and other sites began paywalling their API, causing third party integrations and apps to collapse.

I’m wondering, did any of these sites end up with paying customers for the API? Are there examples of third parties paying to continue their services? These sites sacrificed massive amounts of community and developer good will to privatize the internet - how did it work out for them long term?

  • @kungen@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    8510 days ago

    I don’t know all the numbers, but the point isn’t to make money from people paying for API access, but to force people to use their official applications – which meets their goals of farming more data/advertising money/engagement/whatever.

    • @CaptDust@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought X angle was to get the larger corpo users to buy in such as Nintendo share function, news orgs that would aggregate tweets, universities that used it for research and such. But I agree regarding reddit, definitely wanted to drive users to their engagement ads.

      • @unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        The whole Twitter > x thing has never made any sense. Musk misunderstood what he was signing and accidentally lost an uncountable fortune to buy a social media company and turn it from trash to the shit that skinny raccoons would turn down. Seems to be going well though.

        • lurch (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          610 days ago

          I’m pretty sure he wanted to harm it before the elections or at least make it more right wing. I think he succeeded in both to a degree, his candidate won and he’s getting his reward.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          28 days ago

          I do wonder if it was an accident though. He was s already well past the line of stock manipulation so maybe he listened to a lawyer for once and decided he had to follow through this time to stay out of jail. Of course, destroying twitter was all him

          • @unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 days ago

            I wish I could make sense out of it either

            Like yeah, these characters like Musk are deeply venal and ethically impaired, and that’s just average in my experience

            we’re just gambling I guess

  • @NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I think one of the major reasons they wanted to close the free APIs was to prevent data scraping for AI models without paying the big dollars. Of course that also meant users would be limited to the service’s own apps with their own ads so it’s a bit of a win-win for them.

    I’d imagine the only people paying the insane API prices are the AI/ML companies (edit: like google with its Reddit deal)

  • @bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 days ago

    Basically, each of these sites used open standards and APIs as a way to grow their service. Eventually once they got to the user base they wanted and beat out the competition, they could tighten the screws, lock things down, since the users didn’t have any place to go, they were locked in.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

    In terms of specifics, it’s unclear if they were ever profitable before locking things down, since the main goal at that phase wasn’t making money, it was growing active users and killing competitors. I would have to imagine that with the locked down APIs, they are more profitable, and they never really cared about the community and good will, only when it was beneficial to grow their user base.

  • @daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    It was not about getting paid for API usage, though they let the door open so they could sell that service for very specific purposes but not for alternative apps.

    Their point, and it was admitted during the leaked conversation with one of the independent app developers, was about opportunity cost. Their official apps offer ways to get more money out of users, more advertisement, in app payments and all that. That’s the reason why the phone browser experience has also been killed.

  • @Oisteink@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    710 days ago

    Seems to work fine for those you listed. They wanted people to use their services directly and that’s what they get. It was never about making money off the api, it was about limiting api usage

  • @jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    59 days ago

    Friend, Google is now paying for the privilege of accessing the reddit results and so far no other search engine is able to. I’m pretty sure reddit is making bank…

    Twitter on the other hand, I doubt it. Some media companies might have accepted to pay for access, but most certainly didn’t. They most certainly lost money with the user exodus.

  • @vvilld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    37 days ago

    At least with Reddit, banning 3rd party apps was just a byproduct. The overall point of paywalling their API was to prevent LLM AIs from training their models on Reddit user content without paying Reddit to do so.