• katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Incredibly welcomed. We need more ethical, non-profit AI researchers in the sea of corporate for-profit AI companies.

  • weedazz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    My mind immediately went to a horizon zero dawn like dystopia where the Mozilla AI is the only thing left protecting humans from various malevolent AIs bent on consuming the human race

      • weedazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think by that point ChatGPT would be more like Apollo, keeping the knowledge of humanity. I feel like one of the more corporate AIs will go full HADES, I’m thinking Bard. It will get a mysterious signal from space that switches it’s core protocol from “don’t be evil” to “be evil.”

    • clanginator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Imagining the Mozilla AI as a personified Firefox and Thunderbird fighting off Cortana, some BARD (sorry) and a bunch of generic evil corporate AIs just makes me excited that Mozilla would be the one fending everyone off.

  • Weeby_Wabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ll believe it when I see it.

    I’m so goddamn tired of “open source” turning into subscription models restricting use cases because the company wants to appease conservative investors.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mozilla has a very strong track-record though. They’ve been around for a very long time, and have stuck to free open-source principles the whole time.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I want to give them the benefit of the doubt. I really do. I am going to watch this with a critical eye, however.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.eeBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    As much as I love Mozilla, I know they’re going to censor it (sorry, the word is “alignment” now) the hell out of it to fit their perceived values. Luckily if it’s open source then people will be able to train uncensored models

    • DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      What in the world would an “uncensored” model even imply? And give me a break, private platforms choosing to not platform something/someone isn’t “censorship”, you don’t have a right to another’s platform. Mozilla has always been a principled organization and they have never pretended to be apathetic fence-sitters.

      • Doug7070@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is something I think a lot of people don’t get about all the current ML hype. Even if you disregard all the other huge ethics issues surrounding sourcing training data, what does anybody think is going to happen if you take the modern web, a huge sea of extremist social media posts, SEO optimized scams and malware, and just general data toxic waste, and then train a model on it without rigorously pushing it away from being deranged? There’s a reason all the current AI chatbots have had countless hours of human moderation adjustment to make them remotely acceptable to deploy publicly, and even then there are plenty of infamous examples of them running off the rails and saying deranged things.

        Talking about an “uncensored” LLM basically just comes down to saying you’d like the unfiltered experience of a robot that will casually regurgitate all the worst parts of the internet at you, so unless you’re actively trying to produce a model to do illegal or unethical things I don’t quite see the point of contention or what “censorship” could actually mean in this context.