• palordrolap
    link
    fedilink
    352 years ago

    Channelling my father here, but the lessons learned (but not fixed) after Beeching gutted the railways will be learned again here only too late.

    That is, once you get rid of the minor bus routes, you’ll realise that quite a few people were using those to get to the major bus routes, and now some of the major bus routes are as little used as the minor ones were.

    And so you repeat. Close the minor ones. More minor ones. Confused face. Close the minor ones. Customers are complaining they can’t get anywhere. Profits aren’t rising. Angry face.

    Soon you’re left with only the buses that run the straightest routes to the closest nearby major places and all you can say is “nothing we can do, it’s too expensive to run anything else.”

    • @C4d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Beeching was tasked with solving a maths problem and that is what he did; also the bus services that were recommended never came.

      So now we cut the bus services; there will be a knock on effect on both buses and trains, all at a time at which we are meant to be looking at ways to reduce dependence on cars and promoting walking, cycling and public transport.

      British road and rail infrastructure planning, execution, maintenance and review all fall well short of where they need to be.

    • GreatAlbatrossM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      At least with bus routes, you don’t have to re-lay the track when trialing a re-introduction.

  • @Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    I’m basically cut off from the centre of Bristol now. It’s not like the services were underutilised, every bus would be packed before they cancelled them. The problem is running a bus service for-profit doesn’t work.

    • @smeeps@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      I’m sure it could work, if car infrastructure, fuel etc, was charged at cost to motorist rather than the massive subsidies it currently gets. Then even for-profit buses would look incredibly cheap!

      But yes, motorists are massively subsidised. Buses should be subsidised even more, given they’re a net good to the world and cars a net bad

  • @Carter@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    I just want a bus to go vaguely near where I work so I can stop driving for commuting. I cycle of the weather’s right for it but I really don’t like the heat or rain.

  • @dan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I strongly feel that inner city buses should be council-run and free at the point of use.

    Running buses as private companies is dumb. It either means you have multiple companies competing for passengers on the same profitable routes which is inefficient, or a situation where the govt/council have to carefully divvy up routes, which takes away any incentive to do a better job, and incentivises corner-cutting as that’s the only way to increase profit.

    More people using the bus is a net benefit. Improves traffic, encourages people to go to commercial areas, increases the utility of expanding routes/timetables, etc. The only possible downsides I can think of are that it may encourage bus use over cycling (though I’d argue that most people aren’t cycling because it’s cheaper, and many cyclists will use alternative transport in bad weather), and drivers will moan (but drivers moan about everything).

    I don’t even particularly like taking the bus (personally I’d rather cycle or walk), but it seems like such an easy way to improve quality of life in cities.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      The other thing to think about is it’s possibly easier to improve both services than it is to improve cycle options. Improving cycling requires redesigning roads and that might actually not be possible or particularly quick but adding more buses is a much simpler solution.

      • @JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Bus lanes are more costly than cycle lanes. But cyclists can use bus lanes and they reduce the space available to cars, making the bus and cycling both look much more attractive by comparison. We can kill all three birds with that one stone.

  • bluGill
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Some places have redundant, confusing , infrequent , complex bus routes. Consolidation into less routes that make sense can be a good idea to give people useful routes that take them where they want to go, and when they want to go. As such a number without a detailed in depth analysis is useless

    • @mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The government said it was misleading to equate the figures directly with changes in the number of bus routes – with up to 1,400 of the 3,000 services deregistered by the commissioner over the past two years now operated under local transport authorities – but it acknowledged many services were lost.

  • jerome
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Don’t they have a map? They can use my phone if nobody else has offered.