Quick shout-out to Grayjay: An app to watch videos on any platform - reducing the power of individual services. The Software is open-source and can be found here: https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay

I will test this out for myself and hope someone here finds this useful.

    • They said they’ve been working on it for at least a year so not having a proper license can only mean the license will get more restrictive.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Just asking: what rights are missing for this to be FOSS?

        • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Louis Rossman said in his video that this was so people didn’t repackage the application with ads and malware. He said it’s fair game to recompile and altar it in any other capacity though.

                • @ToxicWaste@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  71 year ago

                  Afterall a healthy mentality. Even if I think Rossmann does some great things - he is still a rando on the internet.

                  Me as a dev understands the desire to protect your work against malicious actors. On the other hand some of the best work is GPL licensed. IMO their license provides an ok middle ground between protection and non-commercial redistribution.

                  Let actions speak louder than words.

              • Aatube
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Ah, so that’s why everyone was so hyped when he developed a €169 software to calibrate the MacBook orientation sensor

        • @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          They can vary the terms of the license for future commits.

          The license seems similar in terms of effect to the MIT license while still giving them control over trademarks and images.

          I’d call this a more restrictive form of MIT but not as copyleft as GPL.

    • @helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Software simply being FOSS does not equal trust. It never has, and never should.

      A free program certainly doesn’t make it trustworthy.

      edit: as pointed out, free stands for liberty to do as you please, not the financial definition. With that in mind, I definitely wouldn’t call Grayjoy FOSS due to the license. I like my made up classification, but maybe this would work better; ROSS, “restricted open source software.”

      An open source program doesn’t make it trustworthy. Unless you vet the program yourself you can never be 100% trusting.

      For most of us, we’re trusting the smaller community of people who actually go through the code for us. We don’t trust individual pieces of FOSS, we trust the FOSS community and recognize that a developer is less likely to place malicious software in the code. However, it’s also much easier for a malicious 3rd party to fork the program and infect the code.

      I’m confident that anything FUTO puts out is going to be heavily looked over by all the Louis haters and fanboys - if they’re up to something shady, we’ll hear about it.

      This particular software is what I’d call Open Source Donation Ware (OSDW)

      “please pay us but we aren’t checking if you do. Here’s the code, if you want you could copy it and remove the payment all together. However, we retain the legal right to destroy any fork that adds spy/malware.”

      As a model, I can respect it. It’s a good medium between releasing the program to the wild and being closed source. It’s also a good model for making money for their work, pretty much like winrar’s approach (rip now that windows is finally getting native .rar support). Yes, some programs are more subtle with a little coffee cup button, but as long as it doesn’t constantly nag you, I’m okay with a more prominent ‘donation’ button.

      • I would like to point out that free in FOSS doesn’t mean free as in gratis. It means free as in libre, means independent. Open source independent software. And I trust no software that isn’t truly FOSS as a personal principle. I don’t care if it’s FUTO, Louis or even goddamn Facebook. Not open? No go. I will stick to Foss alternatives

    • @filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Not sure what part of a free YT+ frontend that doesn’t require permissions or an account you don’t trust, but the reason is they don’t want people to fork it freely and spread a version with malware, like happened to NewPipe.

      • ram
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I understand the reasoning, but I disagree that it’s an effective solution, or if it was, that it’d be worth what you’re giving up.

    • @hikaru755@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      What exactly do you mean by “trust”, here? Yes, it’s not fully FOSS, and I do understand why you wouldn’t like or use it because of that, but you can still verify the code, compile it yourself and build and run it with your own modifications, so how would being fully FOSS make you trust it more?

      • FOSS acts as a layer that protects users from the devolopers. Even if its from a respected privacy youtuber I will not look away because he is conciously making a decicion not to use an open source liscence. They could make it closed source the moment they gwt some marketshare

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      What’s wrong with the FUTO license?

      AFAICT, the only restrictions are you cannot make money off it, and you can’t pretend to be the official app. Very similar to the Mozilla license, although Mozilla’s has some extra bits to be compliant with releasing on the App Store, which has its own licensing requirements that is not met by any version of the GPL

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ohh I see, sounds like more of a principled reason then if i’m understanding you correctly

          Edit: while Louis is accepting feedback on the license specifically, I doubt the project will move to something relicensable, since Louis specifically picked this license to prevent what is happening to NewPipe and the spread of malware using his name to gain trust. He’s also been burned a lot during the R2R stuff with unforseen loopholes abused by rival lobbyists, so the FUTO license is probably looking at things from a protectionist perspective, not as an individual from the FOSS community.

          I’ve only heard of one OSS project relicensing in recent times, and they had to reach out to each individual contributor for written permission, hopefully this rings a bell for someone here because I can’t remember the project name…

  • @Skimmer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    App looks legitimately amazing. Seems a bit buggy in alpha but I’m sure it’ll be ironed out. I just hope they look into supporting Piped instead of directly connecting to YouTube, as well as SponsorBlock. Once they get those 2 things and iron out some of the bugs, I’ll primarily use it for sure. Its a great concept.

    • PrivateNoob
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Wouldn’t interacting through Piped just introduce an additional communication layer, which makes interacting with YT slower? I see your argument with Piped, but what would be the pros of using Piped which outweighs the additional communication costs?

      • @Skimmer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Pro would just be not directly connecting through Google/YouTube servers, and instead using a proxy. Its a nice privacy benefit. I agree it could make things slower, so I don’t think it should completely replace direct connection with YouTube, but I just think the option would be nice to have.

        • PrivateNoob
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Yeah a Piped option would be pretty great tbh, and probably most people wouldn’t notice the additional latency maybe?

    • @LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The app supports plugins for other platforms with development docs coming that I don’t think are out yet. So if they don’t add it someone else certainly can

  • @navi@lemmy.tespia.org
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I wish somewhere on their site or anywhere in that description they’d say “Android App”.

    I was a little disappointed as an iOS user browsing their site trying to find the iOS App Store link 😬.

    Edit: I appreciate the advice to switch to Android but I really wasn’t asking. 😅

    • @LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All you can hope is that some day they are forced to support 3rd party apps because of some anti monopoly lawsuit telling them they have too.

      But good luck with that, Apple is very powerful and can probably just buy out the right lawyers and judges in that situation.

      Or if they were forced to it would have an Apple twist on it like they get to approve the 3rd party app stores that are allowed or something.

      Just get an Android phone you can put a custom ROM on and you’ll have a very good experience.

      • @Piers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        All you can hope is that some day they are forced to support 3rd party apps because of some anti monopoly lawsuit telling them they have too.

        I’m not sure if you are aware already but the reason Epic are announcing a million changes to their business is that the previous business plan was based around them successfully throwing a fortune at suing Apple to force them to support 3rd party apps and they tried and failed.

        I think if it were ever going to happen that way, Epic would have succeeded.

        That’s not to say it won’t still happen one day through political means. Seems plausible the EU might force it at some stage.

  • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Downloaded it and tried it. It’s awesome. It blows invidious and newpipe out of the water. Plus it includes my nebula subscriptions in with my YouTube subscriptions.

    • @hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Do you know if it sends back watch data to the platforms? I pay for Nebula to support the folks I watch, so wouldn’t want to lose out on that.

      • synae[he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I know there is an option for that on the YouTube settings, not sure about nebula though.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Nebula is beta, hopefully it gets support for sending back watch stats and saving watch progress 🙏

        I see they have something similar for YouTube already, where you can enable/disable anonymity (using your google account for requests VS anonymous requests), and enable/disable saving watch history to your linked Google account

  • Arthur Besse
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    where did you find that gitlab link? it isn’t linked from the project website; looking at the website i would assume it isn’t free software.

    edit: oh, i see it isn’t actually free software after all, it is under source ‘source visible’ proprietary license. 🥱

    • @Piers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      It isn’t free however they are very clear that they make no effort to make you pay for it. IE the app works whether you pay or not and they aren’t planning to change that. It’s not free in the same way WinRAR isn’t free. Here’s the announcement video from Louis Rossman where he talks about that. https://youtu.be/5DePDzfyWkw?si=KuNumtHUrtW_kHSC

      • Arthur Besse
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        yes, as i said, it is not free software.

        it is also not open source software.

        hey @ToxicWaste@lemm.ee can you please edit your post to remove the inaccurate statement “The Software is open-source”? you could say it is “source-visible software” or some other 🤡 term, but “open source” has a definition and this software’s license aint it.

        • @ToxicWaste@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          I have found three comments from you, where you insert yourself as an expert on what Open Source is/not is. Although you do link to some sources, you do so without arguing your point. IMO this is not a constructive way of communication. Since I believe your perspective is purist but overall not too helpful, I will go through the trouble an actually argue the point:

          Your problem is following sentence published by the OSI: “The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources.” Which FUTO does - they won’t allow you to put ads on top of their software and distribute it. But I hope that you would agree with me that GNU GPL is an Open Source License. However, they do have a copyleft which practically makes selling software impossible. If you use a library which uses the GPL, you have to make your sources available - which makes selling a compiled version a difficult task…

          If we look at Wikipedia, we see following sentence: “Generally, open source refers to a computer program in which the source code is available to the general public for use or modification from its original design.”, Grayjay fulfils this. Wikipedia continues: “{…}. Depending on the license terms, others may then download, modify, and publish their version {…}”, you are allowed to download and modify Grayjay. They do not allow you to commercially distribute your modifications, which is a license term.

          Lets look at a big OSS company. Red Hat writes: “An open source development model is the process used by an open source community project to develop open source software. The software is then released under an open source license, so anyone can view or modify the source code.” These criteria are fulfilled by the FUTO TEMPORARY LICENSE (Last updated 7 June 2023). Red Hat does not mention the right to redistribute anywhere I could find it.

          To those who actually read up to this point: I hope you find this helpful to form your own opinion based on your own research.

          • Arthur Besse
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            where you insert yourself as an expert on what Open Source is/not is

            this is not really a controversial topic; assuming you were just confused, I linked to the definition and (in another comment you replied to) to the list of governments and other entities which all agree about it. i again encourage you to read those links as it sounds like you haven’t.

            since you’ve declined to remove the inaccurate statement “The Software is open-source” from your post here in !privacy@lemmy.ml I am removing the post. (since I am an admin rather than a mod of the community, the moderation action will only federate to instances running the latest version of lemmy, which your instance isn’t, but fyi it should be removed from lemmy.ml and any other instances running updated software.)

            fwiw i think this is the first time i’ve used my admin privileges to remove something in a discussion i participated in myself, which tbh feels a little weird, but since this is a clear case of someone declining to remove a post making an objectively false claim, i’m going to.

  • @hatchet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    I literally just watched the video from Louis Rossman, and came straight here. Pleased to see everyone already talking about it!

    • I watched a bunch of that too but what was a little concerning to me was holding up Destiny as an example of a good use case for the service. There’s a reason Destiny keeps getting banned from every platform he touches. Putting him up front and center makes me wonder if they have a plan to deal with problematic people (like Destiny). Are they just going to the up hosting white supremacists and Neonazis? That’s not really a (meta)platform i want to support.

  • @hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    The app looks cool, but why did you post this in c/privacy? Does this have some extra privacy related features?

  • RandomStickman
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I tried to import my subscription from YouTube to the app but I got rate limited due to the large amount of channels. Is there a way around it?

    • @normal_user@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Also happened to me.

      Also now the rate limit applied for a while to newpipe as well. Kind of unfortunate that until they fix it it’s not a very useful app.

      • RandomStickman
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I did report it just making sure I haven’t miss anything. Pretty excited about the app

  • @K4sum1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    If only it didn’t require you to have a new phone to run it. (Minimum Android 10)