• Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, Reddit’s chief legal officer, Ben Lee, wrote that the company intends to “ensure that the researchers are held accountable for their misdeeds.”

    “How dare they perform such dangerous and unethical experiments on our users without paying us an appropriate access fee?” He probably went on to say.

  • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    …and the researchers considered thier experiment a success because they didn’t see any comments calling thier bots, bots…it shouldn’t matter that calling someone a bot is a bannable offense there…

  • flatlined@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, we’re gonna tackle bot manipulation for research purposes at the same time we’re gonna deal with bot manipulation for ads and political manipulation, right? Or is it just not okay to do for scientific ends but fine if it’s to sell you shit or advance a political agenda?

    To be clear, this is very much not okay, it’s just weird to me that once the goal is to sell you shit people are much more accepting of it as business as usual.