I hate everything about this

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nope! We have policies of regularly deleting data as leftover data can turn into a legal nightmare, especially when it comes to discovery. It’s much easier to point them to the policy of why it isn’t there than to try to compile and give it to them and then potentially have something buried in there. The only thing we keep longer are things legally obligated.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gods yes. Destroy that data, per written policy. Who the fuck wants to pay a team of lawyers $500 each to hunt through your data.

      keep longer are things legally obligated

      Bingo! Then smoke it, automatically and forever.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s just data until it can be considered evidence. The moment we get a discovery letter, of course we’re legally obligated to preserve the records, but until then it’s just company data and we can do with it whatever we want, including destroying it, otherwise everything in the world is “evidence”

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I took a whole class on this in library school–“records management”–and it was kind of fun watching the more archives-focused students wrap their head around getting rid of data/records as soon as legally allowed.