gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前Seeking for fundinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1505arrow-down10cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldcomicstrips@lemmy.world
arrow-up1505arrow-down1imageSeeking for fundinglemmy.worldgandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square16linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldcomicstrips@lemmy.world
minus-squareladicius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56·1 年前Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other. So essentially you don’t need it.
minus-squarecoherent_domain@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·1 年前Only when addition have a inverse operation.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.
minus-squarekittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 年前Knda like AI, nobody needs it
Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other.
So essentially you don’t need it.
Only when addition have a inverse operation.
If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.
Knda like AI, nobody needs it