• @ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Well I don’t think the federation government would be idiotic enough to try and make every farmer into an industrialist by forcing them to meltdown their own tools in the hopes of creating mechanised farming equipment only to end up with piles of unusable pig-iron slag, and thus contributing to another famine.

          • @ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            Says the Stalinist who’d be the first lined up at the wall and shot by the very ideology they support.

            And for the record, fuck the Nazis, fuck the Tories, and fuck every single fascist rightwing or leftwing.

            Democracy isn’t perfect, but it gives people a voice and if they work hard to maintain proper democratic institutions, it offers the better outcomes for the majority.

    • @bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol really ticked off the tankies. Don’t tell them starfleet hq is… in America!

      edit: sorry, I have been informed tankies’ localization actually has star fleet headquartered in… San Fransokyo from Disney’s Big Hero Six?

    • muddi [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Earth and the Federation was communism. Admittedly an idealist version of it, came about because it was voted in by enlightened voters. But even then the Bell Riots showed that it was capitalism that caused conditions to arise in which the oppressed rose up against the failures of capitalism, and finally end it.

      Not sure if you specifically meant something about Mao, but at least be aware of this. It’s the most basic theory of communism that capitalism fails, turns into barbarism, and the working class have no option but to revolt to resolve the crisis.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          like allowing differences of opinion and anti-authoritarianism

          Getting steamrolled by nazis after inviting them to the table under pompous pretenses of “allowing differences of opinion” isn’t even a viable starter for a government. The Weimar Republic comes to mind.

          The in-setting excuse for why the Federation survived at all, shaky as it was, is that it employs cryptofascists already and gives them unchecked privileges to surveil, harm, and murder on a whim to maintain the status quo: Section 31. You might be a fan.

        • muddi [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          The Federation is built on principles that run counter to Maoism in important respects like allowing differences of opinion and anti-authoritarianism.

          Do you know what the “mass line” concept by Mao is?

    • TC_209 [he/him, pup/pup's]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      The U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 comes across a lost Earth colony during a survey beyond Federation space; a few generations after its establishment, a group of religious zealots take over the operations of the colony, creating a feudal society in which power is held by a select few “holy” families and the vast majority of colonists are little more than slaves. How would Kirk and crew handle this situation?

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Do you have any argument to back that up that isn’t GOMMUNISM VUVULZULA GORILLION DEAD? morshupls

    • AGIMUS
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      This picture is heavily photoshopped. Maybe an AI modified it.

  • kbal
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    There is a kind of political power that grows out of the barrel of a gun. That thing must be destroyed.

  • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    …And yet, the Enterprise is armed. If power does not come from the ability to effectively use violence, but from some other means, then why would the Federation arm it’s flagship?

    • @LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Devil’s advocate, but parts of the Trek universe have shown that there are non- or quasi-sentient creatures capable of endangering starships like the Enterprise, in addition to the usual spacefaring hazards like asteroid belts and debris fields, and the potential to encounter, for lack of a better term, space pirates. It makes sense to arm the ship for a number of reasons not necessarily related to the power of coercion via the threat of violence. The Enterprise’s weapons are also frequently outclassed by other ships of similar size designed for combat. It feels more akin to packing bear spray or a noisemaker to scare off wildlife, and the bear spray gets used to drive off a robber.

      That said, the threat of violence against a better-armed foe in order to prevent combat is a trope the shows rely on frequently, so you have a point.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Aside from an episode of Strange New Worlds (and possible in Wrath of Khan, depending on your perspective), space pirates aren’t brought up as a risk to the Federation starships, presumably because they usually aren’t. Shields alone should be sufficient for debris and asteroids, since shields appear to stop physical objects as well as certain forms of energy (obvs. not certain bands of light though, or whatever bands their sensors use). Non- and quasi-sentient species shouldn’t pose any risk to a starship at all (aside from possibly omniscient comets, thank you Stanislaw Lem). The weapons on a starship are appropriate to direct against planetary settlements, bases, and other starships.

        Fundamentally, I believe Mao was correct on this; the ability to use violence effectively is the lowest common denominator for all power. Everything else is a veneer of civility intended to disguise the violence that is inherent to all forms of coercive rule.

    • Zorque
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      Captain Jean-Luc Picard of the USS Enterprise.

        • hallettj
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          It’s Mao Zedong. He said, “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.” He also led China to mass starvation and terrible poverty, so not someone Picard would subscribe to.

        • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Mao Zedong. Chairman Mao. The dude the Beatles sang about when they said you won’t make it with anyone if you carry pictures of him.

          OP will now be unable to make it with anyone.