axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoWhich git branch are you on?lemmy.cafeimagemessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1409arrow-down10
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imageWhich git branch are you on?lemmy.cafeaxEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square97linkfedilink
minus-squareCubitOom@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up47·edit-25 months agoMy scrum master said that we need new tickets to update the git branches and pipelines to use main instead of master since master was a bad word. I asked him what his job title was again and there was a pause. Then he said we can’t say that we are going to groom the code base anymore.
minus-squarechildOfMagenta@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up12·5 months agoSwitch from your scrum main to your scrum alt.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 months agoI’m gonna go ahead and assume your scrum main doesn’t groom themselves.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 months agoIf we are not grooming the codebase, are we then waxing it? Or is it more eco-friendly to let the codebase grow wild and untrimmed?
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·5 months agoWhy master? main is much clearer
minus-squareDerpgon@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-25 months agoWhy not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner. Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves. Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 months ago everyone understands no, new people learn git every day. ‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agowe should make the empty string the name for the default branch
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoTrunk would be better because of all the branches.
Removed by mod
My scrum master said that we need new tickets to update the git branches and pipelines to use main instead of master since master was a bad word.
I asked him what his job title was again and there was a pause.
Then he said we can’t say that we are going to groom the code base anymore.
Switch from your scrum main to your scrum alt.
I’m gonna go ahead and assume your scrum main doesn’t groom themselves.
If we are not grooming the codebase, are we then waxing it?
Or is it more eco-friendly to let the codebase grow wild and untrimmed?
Why master? main is much clearer
Why not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner.
Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves.
Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
Removed by mod
no, new people learn git every day.
‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
Why main? m is much clearer
we should make the empty string the name for the default branch
deleted by creator
Trunk would be better because of all the branches.