“What do you mean you work more hours than us for less in return? Doesn’t your king fear a revolt?”
We get less of a percentage of our work, but certainly get more absolute value.
The gains in efficiency over the last hundred years have been insane. Today’s crumbs are better than the whole cookie back then.
No more dirt floors, indoor plumbing, electricity, books, etc.
100 years ago, great grandpa was teaching little Appalachian boys who didn’t wear shoes except in the winter.
82 years ago, grandad was a Torpedo Man 3rd class getting asbestos rained on his head every time my wife’s ancestors scored a close hit.
45 years ago, at my other great grandpa’s place in Louisiana, there were black families down the road living in shacks. However you’re picturing a shack, it was worse.
38 years ago, there was a sport called “f** bashing”. Hicks or punkers would wait for gays to come out the bar and beat the shit out of 'em.
38 years ago, we Gen X kids casually lived under threat of global thermonuclear war. Meh. No biggie.
Yeah, not only did efficiency go through the roof, everything got better.
I think the big thing is that they can and should be better than this, too. We shouldn’t have to settle when we’ve made enough abundance for everyone.
Personally, I still want people desperate enough to do shitty jobs like dealing with trash and sewage and people. But I think we have enough to pay those people good money, give them good healthcare, an otherwise comfortable financial life, let them work 32 hours a week, and let them retire at 65.
Basically what unions would have given is if they hadn’t been gutted.
Basically what unions would have given is if they hadn’t been gutted.
At this time, i wonder, whether “union” is just another term for your local friendly anarchists fighting for your rights? Because that’s how people use the term.
You’re right, it’s the should be better that’s important. But I think we can say that about nearly every human culture in history. It’s just that now we can see how fucked up inequality is.
i … don’t really think that “dirt floors” inherently are a problem. sanitation back then sucked but mostly for the cities between 1500 - 1800, because before then big cities weren’t much of a thing and after that soap was invented. idk, maybe i am off about this. correct me if i am wrong.
(btw, does anybody know about the sanitary situation in ancient roman cities?)
but i agree with you.
The gains in efficiency over the last hundred years have been insane. Today’s crumbs are better than the whole cookie back then.
Last time i went to the supermarket, i paid 18€ for a whole bag of food. it was more than enough for a whole day. When i thought how much i had to work for it to pay for it all, it’s like 1.5 hours in total. That is not much. And the food is top quality. No toxins, rather fresh, very nutritious and very convenient to get everything in one place.
Soap was invented a long time ago - 2800 BC and the Romans made quite a bit of it. However it used lye so you wouldn’t want to use it often.
The sanitation of Roman cities should have been pretty good by historical standards. Batthouses were common in the empire and people frequently visited them. Romans also had toilets with running water below them to take the waste away so in that regard they would have done much better than other societies.
The sewer system or lack thereof was the biggest sanitation issue for most historical cities. Back in the day it was difficult to create a sewer system since you need to minimize the slope at which the waste flows or else you have to do too much digging. Until Newton and Leibniz came around in the 1700s we didn’t have calculus so you couldn’t optimize a function mathematically and instead had to experimentally test it out. But, people didn’t test things the way we do today - the scientific method was only formalized relatively recently as well. So this was more difficult to invent that you might think, and the invention has been lost several times over history.
Then once you figure out the minimum angle you have to discover a technique to dig at that angle. The simplest is to take two sticks and insert them into the ground, then tie a string between them that lies right on the ground. Then you can put the sticks this anywhere to see how deep you need to dig.
Since you mentioned 1500-1800, I’ll mention that medieval London did NOT have a sewer system so people dumped their waste in the River Thames. Which is also where they got their drinking water.
thanks, this answer deserves an award
yeah, sanitation is really important, and it’s easy to understand that once you consider that our shit is literally 25% live bacteria by mass. that’s more than a trillion, idk even what the name for numbers that big is. for bacteria, the quantity of bacteria you ingest plays a role (i think) in how dangerous the disease is that you catch, so if you eliminate the biggest source of bacteria, that reduces diseases a lot
And yet we stopped building public baths. We need to bring it back.
The other thing is that we’re both using devices that the most powerful people in the world would have absolutely no possibility of using anything close to as recently as 100 years ago. So it’s not just efficiency gains, but fundamental gains in what’s even available.
There’s a point in time where the amount of spices I have in my pantry would be enough to count me amongst the wealthy. Hell, dinner tonight would have made a king blush with how much pepper I used.
we’re both using devices that the most powerful people in the world would have absolutely no possibility of using anything close to as recently as 100 years ago.
Hell, even 30 years ago
So it’s not just efficiency gains, but fundamental gains in what’s even available.
If you’re talking about computers, computers were available in 1900, just that it was actually women (mostly) in an office doing the maths by hand.
Similar to the “AI” meme comment - “Actually Indians”
:) that’s why I referred to available technology, not the word. “Computers” were available, both as people and as semi-algorithmic adding machines, but the speed, capabilities and operating principles were different to a degree that the only similarities are a name and an abstract mathematical model.
Although picturing the brigades of women with adding machines occasionally sending a telegram to create a 1900s Internet is amusing.
And the study that the claim is made from is fairly dubious. It really only applies to specific types of peasants, during a specific period of time, in specific locations, and counts certain types of infrequent religious breaks from work as a common place given.
The amount of stuff even a relatively poor person has in a developed country would be mind blowing for a medieval peasant.
“You have running water, hot water on demand, and pipes to carry your shit away to a far away land??? You must be the king of kings!”
deleted by creator
It’s called Bliss Point! I just listened to a Stuff You Should Know podcast episode about it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss_point_(food)
If the peasant is from medieval Japan, they may at least understand the umami component
giving a modern microwaved shrimp fried rice bowl to a Japanese medieval peasant
“Yeah, I could believe a shrimp fried this rice.”
A while back I saw a response to that tweet, it went something like
How many of us would throw up if we had to pluck and gut a chicken? The dorito isn’t that impressive.
But if you gave them Takis…
Hot Cheetos and Takis AND the accompanying music video… that’s how you blow some minds
deleted by creator
