• estutweh@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    3 months ago

    Going months at a time without his Facebook account for his legal practice has allegedly cost him thousands of dollars in advertising and communication with clients

    Take a hint, get a professional website and don’t rely on Facebook to host your business.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      149
      ·
      3 months ago

      You have to meet clients where they are. These days, clients are far less likely to find you if you only have a site with no social media presence.

      • sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        3 months ago

        which is the dumbest shit in the world. why the fuck are people on facebook?

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well marketplace basically killed Craig’s list, so that’s one reason.

          • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            This one irks me. I grabbed an Auto-Trader paper today as I was reminiscing about how local trader-papers used to be a thing. I got my NES and Saxophone that way. I still have one of those. -Then craigslist ended that and now that has been replaced by a website that requires membership to read the listings.

            • Cort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yep, I feel ya. It’s so unfortunate that the required membership is what provides the benefits that allowed them to beat Craigslist.

          • smh@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            We gave away computer parts on Craigslist a few months ago. It was a no-stress transaction and the receiver was a sweet old-school computer person building a basic machine for his kids to play Minecraft. Would do again.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 months ago

          Have you tried explaining something to someone lately? A lot of people don’t care and don’t understand. About anything

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          People are on Facebook because that’s where everyone already is. They won’t leave because then they lose contact with all those people.

        • radix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          ‘People who spend too much time on Facebook’ overlaps with ‘People who need cheap lawyers.’

        • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m on Facebook because many people I communicate or work with and pages and groups relevant to my interests are active there.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You could say the same about any social media site really.

          The whole point of social media is to communicate with other people. Facebook is the largest one, so if you want to contact a business or person, they’re more likely to be on Facebook than any other site. Probably the main exception are younger people (and companies run by them), where they’re more active on TikTok and Instagram.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I guess understandable for initial discovery, but it’s on the lawyer if they didn’t hand out a contact card with email phone and whatnot to all clients

        • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Devils advocate, perhaps he did and clients still reached out on FB. When he got banned they assumed he ghosted and went with another lawyer.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      Everything was fine until that no talent ass clown started making social media sites.

    • Dvixen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I was in danger of having sympathy for a lawyer, then this brought me back.

      Way to take a serious matter and make it comical.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you look at the actual quote, that is quite editorialized. My reading if the quote was that it was said in jest.

  • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    Reminds me of how after WW2 people stopped calling their kids Adolf or even changed their name Adolf into something else. I mean, I’m not saying Zuckerberg is literally Hitler or something, but it sure is funnily similar.

    • comador @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same thing happened after WW1 too btw. The strong anti-German sentiments across the US and Europe prompted multiple changes. William and Vilhelm became Bills or Ville; Müller became Miller; Schmidt became Smith.

      I had a lot of Swedish family who did this from around 1915-1930 and as you said, again after WW2.

      • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        As an Austrian, this comment saying that ‘Berg’ translates to both hill and mountain explains a lot about what I’ve seen Germans refer to as Berg. To me it only means mountain.

          • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            A LOT of the ones I’ve seen Germans refer to as that are hills to me, so maybe it’s normal for some. The way we use it, Berg has to go over the tree line, or at the very least be steep enough at the top to not have vegetation there.

        • Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, isn’t hill hügel/hüble? Currently hiking in DE and just climbed one and it had the signs, too. Now the real question is - at what point is it considered a mountain?

          • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Our definition: either high enough or steep enough to have no vegetation at the top. For some people, only the former definition counts. But from experience, the definition must be different in Germany. Maybe someone from there can chime in to share their definition!

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    See? I knew the different instances of this bot would start fighting each other one day.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    A celebrity? Holy fucking ego, batman!

    I say make it a cage match. Thunderdome style.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why are they even assuming someone would want to impersonate meta Zuckerberg?

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Serious answer: A surprising number of people, especially those who still have Facebook accounts in 2025, are susceptible to scams where someone pretends to be a rich and/or famous person asking for favours or money.

      They get a message from a fake Zuck, and because they are dangerously credulous, they believe it is the real Zuck.

      Zuck says they’ve been selected, or won a prize, or should send a photo or some such, and then suddenly Zuck’s blackmailing for a compromising photo or otherwise requesting Amazon gift cards or Bitcoin to “unlock” the prize or whatever.

      “Zuck’s a rich man who owns the platform. He knows what he’s doing. I’d better look into how to do this Bitcoin thing.”

      Facebook knows all this and so any Zucks that are not the Zuck get flagged as scammers and have their accounts shut down.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re worried that one of his clones might’ve escaped its “exit interview” and could expose the program. The accelerated aging and memory writing processes aren’t perfect and if one starts to degrade, it may be feel compelled to get on Facebook despite the obvious risk of Meta tracking it down. Lucky side-effect, I guess.

      Here are some photos of the- hang on, will have to edit and add those later, somebody’s knocking on my door.