• @JackDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    The filing centred around the 30% cut that the platform holder takes, with the developer arguing that Valve used “dominance to take an extraordinarily high cut from nearly every sale that passes through its store” and that it has used its position to “exploit publishers and consumers.”

    Isn’t 30% standard in every store? Also, Valve certainly has dominance, but it’s hardly a monopoly. There are more options than any other OS.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, surely they can point to the Epic v Apple lawsuit and also point to the ability to install Heroic or any other launcher/software on their platform, and the judge will laugh the plaintiffs out of the courtroom.

      I’m not a fan of the 30% cut, but that really is par for the course and any other company could compete with them on their own platform, unlike with Apple’s iOS. So I see no basis here for a lawsuit.

      I’m guessing the plaintiffs just wanted to meet Gabe and felt this was the easiest way to get a 1:1…

      • @mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        A developer can even sell steam legs directly from their own site and not have to pay Valve the 30% cut. (If I remember correctly.)

        • verysoft
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah as long as the game is available for the same price to consumers on Steam. Most people will just buy directly from Steam, so you would have to convince your audience to buy from your site directly.

    • verysoft
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yup, I don’t see how this suit ever goes anywhere. It would be a better use of time to argue that your $500 Xbox has a locked down marketplace and can’t play Steam/PlayStation games.

      • TwilightVulpine
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        It shows that companies are regarded above customers when every console is a closed ecosystem with a single store, no sideloading support, but nobody challenges that.

        • verysoft
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yeah, all this about phones being able to sideload apps, when are they going after these consoles?

    • TwilightVulpine
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Apparently this isn’t standard anymore, and I can see how developers don’t like it, but an antitrust lawsuit over this just seems poorly justified. For whoever doesn’t want to sell on Steam under their conditions, there is Epic, GOG, Humble and ItchIO. Maybe those don’t sell as well, but that’s the choice the company is making.

      I don’t think being the largest store by itself is grounds for this sort of legal action. Especially not when they became the biggest store simply by providing good services for a good price, rather than any sort of restrictions at companies publishing in it.

  • @zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Holy crap wolfire still exists? Feels like they were just making overgrowth for 20 years and I can’t remember the last time I’ve heard anybody mention that game

  • @kugmo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Timmy’s going to hire a hitman to take out Gabe because he’s eternally seething at EGS failing to take market share from Steam.

    • @Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Tbh this thing sounds like that very much. It may not be an assassination attempt at all, ut the ridiculous rules to “show face when speaking so we can see how do you feel about what you say” is very much bullshit in this scenario. A proper written essay about the working of Valve would suit the questions way better than having someone put in person in a limited time to answer things out of mind under pressure.