ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 months agoMonadslemmy.worldimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1294arrow-down10
arrow-up1294arrow-down1imageMonadslemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 months agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squareJonathan Lamothe@social.jlamothe.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months ago@mEEGal @ZILtoid1991 Honestly, the best way I’ve found to understand monads (if we’re talking Haskell) is to look at the type signatures of its functions. Understanding return, (>>=), and (>>) will essentially tell you everything you need to know.
@mEEGal @ZILtoid1991 Honestly, the best way I’ve found to understand monads (if we’re talking Haskell) is to look at the type signatures of its functions. Understanding
return,(>>=), and(>>)will essentially tell you everything you need to know.