- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
OpenAI is full of shit, as usual. They want engagement and they need revenue. They’ll do whatever it takes to get those things. Political ideology and sociological ramifications are an afterthought.
Private equity having a normal one
The reason why I can’t stand LLMs is because they congratulate me before replying to anything I say. This could be a good thing.
That’s a great point – and an important distinction.
Somewhere, sometime, ChatGPT is telling the stupidest person in the world “Yes, you are absolutely correct!”
Pretty telling that the headline is that they want to do something, rather than they did something.
You might try to be apolitical, but given that people seem to like echo chambers, if you don’t, I bet that a competitor will.
Literally the motivation behind Grok.
“ChatGPT doesn’t lie in the way that puts us in a positive light. So I’ll make my own AI to do just that!”
“”“”““Wants””“”“”
Don’t they watch South Park: if they want to know how to do that, “Dude, just ask ChatGPT”.
Expectation: AI stops congratulating you
Reality: AI calls you a gay fag for even asking commie questions.







