cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/54239937

During the Great Depression, when banks foreclosed on farms, neighbors often showed up at the auctions together.

They’d bid only a few cents, and return the land to the family that lost it. Sometimes a noose hung nearby as a warning to outsiders not to profit from someone else’s ruin.

It was rough, but it worked, communities protected each other when the system wouldn’t.

If a collapse like that happened today, do you think people would still stand together or has that kind of solidarity disappeared? Could it happen again?

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    ·
    edit-2
    2 个月前

    Mod notice: This post is kinda in the grey area of being in breach of Rule 6, but it’s a good question with decent answers, so it gets to stay.

    Stay classy.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      2 个月前

      Let it stand! I see it as more of a question of how people would react to such a disaster in modern America.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        2 个月前

        Plus rule 6 is mostly there to prevent this board from being flooded with questions about whatever annoying orange did in the past 24h

      • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 个月前

        Not really, the great depression in capital letters was almost 100% in the US.

        The rest of the world had a recession, a bit tougher than normal but nothing near what happen in the US

        • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 个月前

          The US Great Depression directly lead to hyperinflation in Weimar Germany which lead to the rise of National Socialism.

          Edit: I was wrong, the hyperinflation was 9 years prior and it was a 30% unemployment rate from the crash which was a leading factor to National Socialism, not hyperinflation.

            • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 个月前

              Seems I mixed up the unemployment from the depression with the hyperinflation of the Weimar Republic.

              I’ve edited my comment to say this

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 个月前

            Part of that was linked to a great drought on US farms caused by overfarming leading to the dust bowl. That was a major part of the US GDP then. And 100 years later people still don’t believe humans can alter the environment.

            • DNS@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 个月前

              The US at the time deported Latino citizens due to the increases racism/bigotry. Most of them were farmhands who knew how to work the land, better than the white farmers. The US realized their mistake in the middle of the depression and attempted to woo the same people back under the Vaquero program. The promise of citizenship was never fulfilled by the US.