lumpenproletariat@quokk.auBannedM to PhilosophyMemes@quokk.auEnglish · 7 months agothis seems relativequokk.auimagemessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down10
arrow-up1174arrow-down1imagethis seems relativequokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.auBannedM to PhilosophyMemes@quokk.auEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoI know you’re taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?
minus-squareBrainsploosh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoWhen arguing for a universal intent, it’s typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent. The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoAh. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.
I know you’re taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?
When arguing for a universal intent, it’s typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent.
The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.
Ah. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.