I understand having a limit for small crimes but for huge ones, like murder, why would the crime prescribe? Is there a reason for that?!

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    To prevent a suspect from being legally harassed by the state indefinitely. Sometimes suspects are innocent.

    Also, to ensure a speedy trial.

    Also, many kinds of evidence, especially the ones available when these limits were put in place, degrade significantly over time.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not being an asshole I’m just curious and wanted to understand this concept since I don’t have any legal understanding. Thanks for the answer :)

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are a diversity of reasons. In some cases it is to protect the purpertrator.

    In my state the statute of limitations for bring legal charges for child sex abuse is 4 years after the child turns 18.

    If you were raped as a child you have file charges before you turn 22. Most people can’t even come to terms with what happened to them at that age, let alone file charges.

    There have been four major attempts to remove that statute and all for failed.

    What to know who funds the effort to prevent the statute from being changed?

    The Catholic Church.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      yeah that’s fucked up. Tbf that is why I asked. I understand all the other justifications but for me not paying for a horrible crime just because ot’s been too long is ridiculous. Sometimes it takes longer to gather evidence or to even identify the person

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Reducing the number of false accusations. Prevents situations like someone claiming “Xyz stole my car 30 years ago, arrest them!”.

    Lack of evidence. It’s almost impossible to definitively prove something that happened long ago to the level of reasonable doubt required by courts.

    Relevance. Theft from 30 years ago has no bearing on anyone’s life any more. For same reason the statute of limitations usually doesn’t exist for murder. Murder from 30 years ago still impacts people today.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    US-centric answer: Murder doesn’t have any time limitations on being charged.

    https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/time-limits-for-charges-state-criminal-statutes-of-limitations.html

    There are always going to be holes in the law, so it probably wouldn’t be difficult to find some example of a horrible crime that finds a loophole in this, but the general idea is that the worst crimes have no statute of limitations.

    Misdemeanors are usually fairly short, many felonies are longer, sex crimes are often (but not always) exempt, and murder has no limit in any state.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Many other reasons have been given. One more: let the archivists know when it’s time to throw away the paperwork and evidence.

    Some crimes go unsolved with a bit of evidence collected, stamped, filed and stored somewhere.

    At some point you’ll have to build a new building just to store the stuff if you never clear it out.

    If you only keep the stuff for a few crimes such as murder the growth will be much more manageable.