☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 天前Germany’s China playbook: if you can’t beat them, partner upwww.scmp.comexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down10
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkGermany’s China playbook: if you can’t beat them, partner upwww.scmp.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 天前message-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareBlisterexe@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 天前As if the US is a better trade partner, like let’s be real
minus-squareKami@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 天前aNd wHAtaBoUt - insert random thing - ??!!?11
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 天前Imagine trying to argue that the US is “a random thing” when talking about European trade relation
minus-squareBlisterexe@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 天前No I agree that depending on china isn’t ideal, but at some point you can’t go it alone.
minus-squareKami@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 天前It’s way worse than not ideal depending on a fascist dictatorship.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 天前Yeah, depending on the US is way worse than not ideal, you’re right
As if the US is a better trade partner, like let’s be real
aNd wHAtaBoUt - insert random thing - ??!!?11
Imagine trying to argue that the US is “a random thing” when talking about European trade relation
No I agree that depending on china isn’t ideal, but at some point you can’t go it alone.
It’s way worse than not ideal depending on a fascist dictatorship.
Yeah, depending on the US is way worse than not ideal, you’re right