• @simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1031 year ago

    The presentation used the example, “Imagine ChatGPT, but it already knows everything about your life.”

    I’m impressed someone thought of that, wrote a presentation, rehearsed it, then presented it and at no point thought that it sounds creepy and invasive.

      • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        It sound like exactly what i have been saying is the future of human growth.

        Ai companions that are like a butler, best friend, therapist, mailperson, accountant, lawyer all in one.

        Your ai talks to their ai, before you ever met they each return a baseline of info, conversational opener and suggestions for meeting at a date/location

        And absolutely yes on the open source under my direct control cause holy shit end of the world if it is not.

    • @inspxtr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      suggests either these people are so detached from reality, or they are appealing this to very specific sets of people under the guise of a general appeal

    • sour
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      not even family member know everything about life

      is private

  • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    Oh dont worry, we already have the data. This is just a formal announcement. Your new bot will arrive in 5 days.

    • andrew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      The bot has already existed in a different form for years. Instead of you talking to it they asked it which ads are most effective to show you specifically.

      Google is not just getting into ML. They’ve been at the bleeding edge for decades.

  • @800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Jokes on us tho. Google is going ahead with this, it’s just never going to made available for public use. It’s only to use for figuring out exactly what we’ll buy.

    • @treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why have a bot just figure out what consumers want when it you can also have it do direct marketing?

      This announcement wasn’t for consumers, but advertisers.

  • @Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Google can’t even keep a podcast service going. I certainly wouldn’t trust them with a little buddy that I care about.

  • @Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    The right to NONassociation should always outrank the right to association.

    Molesters may claim the right to closely-associate, but the right-to-be-not-molested should outrank their association-right.

    Nonassociation needs to be a fundamental right.

    In multiple contexts.

    Abusees who want no-contact to have teeth,

    molester-survivors,

    etc.

    Including identity-molestation/theft, and other abuses of one’s personal information.

    _ /\ _

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    A chatbot that needs to mind its own damn business, I say.