well, especially since se also works as a domain, so I originally was expecting, to use related syntax for fun se|li (or plain old se/li) and had to go back and reread. At first read it as se/org/li as in, “se OR org OR li” work and I thought, “no, they just said org doesn’t work.” Then I reread and recognized the sed pattern.
This is the fediverse you don’t need to be cryptic about it
https://annas-archive.li/
s/org/li isn’t being cryptic. That’s a common way to write “substitute org with li”
Well, common in certain circles. Definitely cryptic for everybody else, though.
A “common way”? It’s sed syntax. Non-technical people will not get it.
I am technical and it was not clicking
Ed is the standard editor
https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.en.html
deleted by creator
I had no idea what the fuck they were talking about. Thank you.
Common within a very small niche. I got it, but still assumed you were trying to circumvent some kind of censorship
I’d wager a lot of people from that small niche are registered on the Fediverse, though.
Aye. Bookmarking this thread to remind people when I see complaints Lemmy isn’t taking off enough except for super technical topics.
I use that syntax during work and still needed a hint to mentally parse the comment this way
well, especially since se also works as a domain, so I originally was expecting, to use related syntax for fun se|li (or plain old se/li) and had to go back and reread. At first read it as se/org/li as in, “se OR org OR li” work and I thought, “no, they just said org doesn’t work.” Then I reread and recognized the sed pattern.
TIL 😅
…now guess what it means if a patient is S.O.B.
At least use
|for theORstatement.