cm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoPride Versioninginfosec.pubimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1imagePride Versioninginfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squareVibeSurgeon@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70·2 months agoUnder semantic versioning, you should really be ashamed of bumping the major number, since this means you went and broke backwards compatibility in some way.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up63·2 months agoYou have done something, that it’s worth breaking backwards compatibility over.
minus-squareSaapas@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoYeah I just forgot how the old stuff worked
minus-squaresunbeam60@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up20·2 months agoExcept from 0.x.x to 1.0.0. That one means you’re committed to keeping the API/format stable. At least how I think about it.
minus-squaremkwt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoFor me 1.0 only means that I’ve delivered the software to a paying customer.
Under semantic versioning, you should really be ashamed of bumping the major number, since this means you went and broke backwards compatibility in some way.
You have done something, that it’s worth breaking backwards compatibility over.
Yeah I just forgot how the old stuff worked
Except from 0.x.x to 1.0.0. That one means you’re committed to keeping the API/format stable. At least how I think about it.
For me 1.0 only means that I’ve delivered the software to a paying customer.
Python agrees.
Sir…