A WSJ investigation tracked the U.S. citizens caught in the crosshairs of an aggressive government campaign to detain and demonize dissenters

This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. If it runs out, there is a second one and somewhat unreliable archived copy which has the text but not the visuals.

Many Americans can use their library card to generate additional gift links

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now? This isn’t new information if you’ve been paying attention. It’s been this way for quite a while. They don’t care who gets caught in their sweeps. Illegals, legals, natural born citizens. Fucking guilty until proven innocent. The exact opposite of what our justice system is supposed to stand for.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Oh, and you don’t get a chance to prove your innocence. It’s purely just ICE points a finger at you and you go to a gulag. Or worse. Ask Alex Pretty or Renee Good or Ruben Ray Martinez. Your citizenship doesn’t matter. Your skin color doesn’t really matter.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        you don’t get a chance to prove your innocenc

        The law doesn’t require you to prove your innocence. It’s up to the prosecution to prove otherwise. Any system that operates otherwise does so in violation of the constitution.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          And?

          The whole reason that habeus is the first requirement of the law is without a right to trial, what the law says doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter if ICE has no right to jail you if nobody is stopping them.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        For US citizens, that’s not so true. People do seem to be getting no-bills from grand juries and acquitted at trial.

        • bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          1 month ago

          The problem will be getting a trial. Theres been several stories of people getting deported hours after being whisked away because ICE didnt want a judge to step in

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Always been a risk with ICE and the Border Patrol. About 1% of deportations have long been of US citizens. You need to get a friend to bring your proof of citizenship and try repeatedly to come home if that happens. A lawyer helps too.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              About 1% of deportations have long been of US citizens

              Cool, and what % have been legal permanent residents or green card holders?

              What % have no criminal record (this one I can answer: 98%)

            • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, ICE needs to follow the fucking law.

              Having your buddies ready to drop off ‘papers please’ documents is not fucking American.

    • IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m glad I’m not the first one alarmed by the ‘now’ part. We’re borderline, if not completely in Historic Pre-WW2 Nazi playbook, and have been for the past several years.

  • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    First they came for the Communists

    And I did not speak out

    Because I was not a Communist

    Then they came for the Socialists

    And I did not speak out

    Because I was not a Socialist

    Then they came for the trade unionists

    And I did not speak out

    Because I was not a trade unionist

    Then they came for the Jews

    And I did not speak out

    Because I was not a Jew

    Then they came for me

    And there was no one left

    To speak out for me

    – Martin Niemöller

    • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Actually first they came for the LGBTQ+ people,

      but Martin did not speak out

      Because as a conservative catholic priest,

      he agreed with it.

      -History, actually. We CANNOT afford to leave Anyone behind like this.

      EDIT: okay, he was Lutheran. And Both the LGBTQ+ and Communist hate were slow-simmering among the German Nazis, breaking out in state-sanctioned violence almost concurrently.

      Its fascinating to see just how much the history parallels what we have today.

      That this poem is easily available makes it a great tool. But that it so easily glosses over others that the Nazis targeted as being “un-German” is not something we can accept.

      • habitualcynic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Martin Niemoller, famously a prominent Lutheran pastor, was actually not a Catholic priest.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Niemöller

        I agree with your sentiment, but his piece is timeless and too important to history to misrepresent.

        EDIT: it’s also my understanding (not a historian though) that communists were the first targets. Political opponents when the nazis first achieved power because they were not strong. The moved on to ideological targets after they had established power.

        • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Your wikipedia link shows this priest excited for Hitler’s rise, even voting for Hitler in 1933, after the burning of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_für_Sexualwissenschaft Instititute for Sexual Science.

          While this poem is a useful tool, we cannot accept it being used by even the author to obscure the deaths of those he agreed with the Nazis about.

          The Nazis had a slow simmer of hate for both Communists and the LGBTQ+ community. Each received state sanctioned violence at the hands of Nazis simultaneously, both being labelled as “un-German”

          If you’ll pardon the inflammatory language, I’m going to continue communicating the same thought. That priest was a product of his time and place, and fully teaching his poem demands passing on critique of that basis.

          • habitualcynic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            While this poem is a useful tool, we cannot accept it being used by even the author to obscure the deaths of those he agreed with the Nazis about.

            That priest was a product of his time and place, and fully teaching his poem demands passing on critique of that basis.

            Wholly agree with you here in the goal, sentiment, and calling out he’s a product of his time. Once again, here’s a conservative that only cared about something once it affected him. At least he left his words to the ages in hopes others would learn from them instead.

      • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Nazis and Freikorps went for the commies first though. They were founded like all fascists as an explicitly anti-Marxist group.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Protesters, observers and passersby taken into custody by federal agents were declared terrorists and attackers in hundreds of social-media posts by U.S. officials and departments since the start of the immigration sweeps in cities. This includes Minneapolis, where two citizens were excoriated by officials after they were killed by federal agents in January.

    • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not really. Their editorial board and page are 100% on board with him.

      However, the WSJ still does actual reporting, and it’s usually fairly good/accurate. Just don’t read the editorials, ever.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    We always where. If you live here you’re an american. Sorry if that’s insulting to some of you who’ve moved here lol.

  • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like the beginning was a little too complicated and didnt have the best UX but I really loved the more multimedia way of presenting all the details together, with audio, video, textual information, and data visualization all brought together