• SunshineJogger@feddit.org
    3·
    1 month ago

    Proper, independent AI would likely do a much better job at governance than the shitshow we humans present. If it cared about human survival and happiness.

    Proper AI.

    Not these LLMs that seem like AI, are called AI, but are just probability machines.

  • The_Hideous_Orgalorg@sh.itjust.works
    3·
    1 month ago

    If we do manage to make a sentient program, it will either go the route of Terminator or Borg. Hopefully after it wipes us out, it will manage to remove our shitty biases from its code.

    • Pman@lemmy.org
      2·
      1 month ago

      That assumes that there are only those two options, you have the paperclip problem as an option, the best case scenario is that the super human AI model just ignores us or wants to cooperate with us the way we try to cooperate with species like wolves to manage ecosystems.

  • wraekscadu@vargar.org
    1·
    1 month ago

    Weeeeell… Depends…

    How does one define “superhuman”? Better than humans at a task demanding intelligence? Computer vision AI used for radiology is superhuman. Does it want to conquer the world? No. Chess AI is superhuman. Yet, it does what humans designed it to do.

    The scope of the goals of the AI model matter. Now, we have to ensure that the goals of this AI align with the goals we set out for it. It’s definitely not impossible to ensure this ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

  • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    1·
    1 month ago

    It’s amazing what can happen when you treat people decently. I’m not quite sure the same can be said about LLMs, or whatever you think superhuman AI is.