Innerworld@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoThe US House rejects an extension of FISA's Section 702, ensuring the warrantless surveillance program will expire for the first time since its 2008 enactmentwww.politico.comexternal-linkmessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down10cross-posted to: privacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up144arrow-down1external-linkThe US House rejects an extension of FISA's Section 702, ensuring the warrantless surveillance program will expire for the first time since its 2008 enactmentwww.politico.comInnerworld@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square2linkfedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareYoFrodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months ago*legally allowed warrantless surveillance It seems that lately if something isn’t actively enforced then the govt just gets away with breaking the law
*legally allowed warrantless surveillance
It seems that lately if something isn’t actively enforced then the govt just gets away with breaking the law