• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Did you read in the intended “not” into “Pascal’s wager was intended to be taken seriously.” ? Because I think it was an idle thought experiment that got taken up by Christians.

    I have spent more time reading monster manuals than I ever have playing… it’s mythological crack.

    If you want more, the person that’s pushed forward my thinking most recently is Britt Hartley of No Nonsense Spirituality on YouTube. She cheekily refers to herself as “your atheist spiritual director”, but there’s a lot of wisdom there. I think you’ll appreciate her attempts to separate the baby from the bathwater, as you have with Catholicism here.

    • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Ooh you know I actually didn’t, I was just assuming he was being serious considering the non-secular time he existed in. But I didn’t exactly think he was talking about the results being literal eternal suffering or paradise either. In my misconception I had thought he was proposing to live as a functional faith practitioner and just reap the tangible benefits of that when you’re alive. So thanks for prompting me to actually look at it.

      You already know I love youtube. I’ll get to that first before the books but probably not before the further Wikipedia articles I got recommended in this thread. Is it cool if I message you any thoughts she stirs up? I definitely appreciate people who can identify pro-social and useful facets of problematic ideologies.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure! Love to hear your thoughts.

        She’s like a third-wave atheist, recognizing that hating women and muslims isn’t a coherent philosophy to build a life around, that there’s more to the human project than being technically correct actually.