• schmorp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    give nature time and space

    That’s what a biodiverse landscape does? I didn’t say unmechanized - but there’s a difference between running giant machines over 200ha of the same and running a small tractor over a 2ha field. For the landscape it makes all the difference: having 2ha of one thing, then a hedge (that can contain edible fruits and berries), then something else, maybe have pasture with nut and chestnut on it, instead of just pasture.

    Even in a small vegetable garden planting different plants together is so much easier. Higher plants give shade to smaller ones, aromatic ones protect pest-endangered ones … recreating an actual ecosystem is the real deal.

    Todays’ rural areas are empty of people. They were bought out by those people who consented to being enslaved by the machine and fuel complex. The ones who were forced to leave had to become wage slaves in the cities. The ones who run the system now don’t even want to touch the soil anymore! They just send a fucking drone to analyze where to dump how much of their chemicals. It’s not a sustainable way of managing soil and water.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s what a biodiverse landscape does? I didn’t say unmechanized - but there’s a difference between running giant machines over 200ha of the same and running a small tractor over a 2ha field. For the landscape it makes all the difference: having 2ha of one thing, then a hedge (that can contain edible fruits and berries), then something else, maybe have pasture with nut and chestnut on it, instead of just pasture.

      I agree entirely, with pretty much everything you posted, but that’s still monoculture. One crop per field, only much more ecologically friendly.