awful.systems
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
xkcd bot@lemmy.worldB to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago

xkcd #3298: Aerospace Flowchart

imgs.xkcd.com

message-square
35
link
fedilink
307

xkcd #3298: Aerospace Flowchart

imgs.xkcd.com

xkcd bot@lemmy.worldB to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
35
link
fedilink

xkcd #3298: Aerospace Flowchart

Title text:

Someday, we will find the problem that goes with this solution.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3298/

explainxkcd for #3298

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like you’re ignoring how cool massive airships are

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can confirm, I went on a Zeppelin flight earlier this summer, can absolutely confirm that it was damn cool.

  • TheShamMirrors@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    deleted by creator

  • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    But how do we convince investors to fund huge airship hangars in low density regions? They need adventure pools too, you know?

    Tropical island adventure pool

    Wiki link

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    We should do it anyway, just to be sure.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Last month I went on a Zeppelin ride, there are some tasks that airships do well. Tourism tours, long term temporary monitoring, some specific geo surveys and advertising.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      High altitude airostat balloons have also been considered as a superior alternative to satellites for some applications due to lower ping and greater resistance to solar activity. Unfortunately it turns out its also harder to make a long lasting high altitude balloon with consistent positioning than it is to launch something into space.

    • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whoa. Good for you.

      And for radio relays. Although that’s more of a balloon job.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Here are some pics:

        https://lemmy.zip/post/69633471

    • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wow, I’m envious!

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I find it hard to believe that there are problems you can’t solve with giant airships.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      you’re right. i bet my cat would be less gassy if we lived at altitude, too

      i’m not sure i would change that tho, she seems to enjoy farting on people.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As the Total War 3 mod which basically turns the Empire into a ww1-ww2 era power has taught me, if you can’t solve a problem with zeplins you aren’t using enough of them. Now if you’ll excuse me the Karl Franz zeplin armada has some French to purge.

    • 1D10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If we made them extremely luxurious and everyone agreed that only the “best” people could use them for travel, I could see them solving a few problems.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I studied aerospace engineering. Can confirm

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Could we put an airship in Venus’s atmosphere? It seems like it’d be more useful than sending something to the surface, but I know nothing about the engineering involved.

    • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      For a short time, maybe. Until it is shred to pieces or dissolved by the atmosphere I would guess. But I’m not an aerospace engineer. :)

      • philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, it’s actually kind of an idea that people have thought about. The upper atmosphere on Venus is a kind of OK environment and because of the thick atmosphere, it’s even easier to float there than on earth. The trouble really starts when the acid clouds begin.

        • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Good to know.

          The trouble really starts when the acid clouds begin.

          Yes, it’s always the same with acid clouds.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I find it odd that the answer is ALWAYS no. Surely at least one problem has been solved by building giant airships.

    • libewa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mass transport (of rich people and military) before the invention of the jet engine.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Airships are the most expensive, worst and most dangerous solution to any problem.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        i disagree. you could build catamaran-style airships.

        that sounds far more expensive and more dangerous.

        not worse though, that sounds way cooler.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Building a worse airship is still building an airship.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              And name them Akron and Macon.

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                i was going to name them after match companies but i like your idea

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oh you must be European, if you’re concerned about fires aboard airships. American airships don’t burn; we’ve never been stupid enough to use hydrogen as a lifting gas. USS Akron and USS Macon both crashed, much of the crew of one froze to death and the other proved surprisingly survivable. Compare that to the Hindenberg or R-101.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I noticed the lack of a ‘Yes’ flow.

  • Napster153@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    What about huge underwater submersibles ?Won’t someone think of the captains obsessed with the cleanliness of sheets?

  • yojimbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There is hope though:

    • America has it’s own no joke airship to orbit program
    • Airlander will hopefully soon start to fly short haul flights in Spain (and like 20 of them)🤞🏻
  • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    China: “Hold my blimp.”

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    sadly there is no yes line in first triangle of flowchart.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    pretty please?

xkcd@lemmy.world

xkcd@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !xkcd@lemmy.world

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 484 users / day
  • 899 users / week
  • 1.9K users / month
  • 4.99K users / 6 months
  • 8 local subscribers
  • 18.2K subscribers
  • 647 Posts
  • 10.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • koraro@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org