• tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 months ago

    This might be brushed off by Republicans as a move by a sour loser since he lost his primaries to a Trump fanboy, but it means the GOP candidates will have to take sides on an unpopular war right before the midterms.

    • banter6888@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 months ago

      Correct. 2/3 of the Senate present required to remove.

      At least it’s a start. His boss is ultimately responsible, but it’s better than nothing if they succeed.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Impeaching cabinet members one at a time is a reasonable strategy. It is certainly a good topic to get GOP election campaigns to talk about defending.

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only drawback to this is that a lot of innocent people are going to killed while he keeps fucking things up.

      • massacre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        True, but that’s happening one way or another. At least this way, the longer term goal may be nearer and save more lives in total

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh no, not Drunk Pete! Where else could the Republicans possibly find a colossal failure of a humanish being to pretend to be good at war?