What a stupid ragebait headline. Of course a geneneral is not going to even suggest they would disobey a hypothetical lawful order. Why would someone end their career for some journalists gocha question?
Says nothing about his private thoughts or what he would actually do. Zero information value.
Do you use plain webdav for all your files? Mounted on your computer or via libreoffice somehow?
I think you might mean “partisan” rather than political. Ethics is always political.
If this were about pulling data from GNIS, it would have taken at least a month to show up on their platform. Its governent data and legacy data pipelines.
Some Google developer had to write an entry for this to happen so fast. 100%.
He only has the power to do that for the executive branch. He can’t compel citizens or corporations to follow along - not with the law anyway.
Exactly. And when companies and citizens are rushing to comply out of either fear of retribution or the hope that sycophancy will keep them in the protected “in-group”?..
Thats fascism.
Then why does Google show “Gulf of America” in brackets to Europeans? Why did Google update “Lake America” to Americans faster than the actual usgs maps?
Sycophancy is the answer.
All that stuff is a lot of expensive data entry and purchasing of live data feeds.
I have no interest in paying for a search engine, but if someone like Kagi did a legit google maps replacement, I would pay.
Yes. Thats how all these platforms work. Many things have several names that are region specific. If you are in France, you might even see “United States of America” renamed! (Spoiler, it is often translated).
Still shows their colours yet again that they make the change within America, even before the usgs maps.
Weekend editions are very much a great way to protect your mental health too. There really isnt more than a handful of stories a week that are still important a few days later and the rest of it is noise meant to keep you hooked on drama.
The Avro Arrow is a bad example because it has nothing to do with neoliberal economics.
It was ostensibly about being over budget, but that was just the public claim at the time.
It was a high speed interceptor designed to chase down Russian bombers coming over the arctic circle. The Americans knew that ICBMs were the new threat and no interceptor could ever chase one down. They told Diefenbaker as much.
He shelters and protects a man who raped kids.
Thats not better.
Yeah, literal camera pointed at computer screens, with a view of fingers on the keyboard, and who knows what apps installed with access. Anyone who does that should be fired as they are a danger to the organization.
I hate that I had to retire my Raybans to home use only. They look exactly like meta glasses.
I agree wholeheartedly! These oligarchs own every media outlet and have way too much influence on public opinion for such a tiny fraction of a percent of lucky sociopaths.
Shame on them for scapegoating the Women and gender minorities for the problems created by people with actual power.
Canadians are generally happy to always aim for marginally better than America.
If you have a reasonable group of people like a friends and family group, you can get machine learning to be very accurate (with odd exceptions like babies and twins). But what is 99% accurate for 50 people will almost universally give false positives when searching a group of 50 million faces. The math just doesnt work for them.
No, they will do what they do everywhere else and stack the decks so that nullification is only ever used for “their people”.
Why should law enfocement and prosecuters get to decide which laws to enforce and which not to, but jurrors cant?
Unless the laws on the books were short and perfect, there is always going to be enforcement choices, and it seems to me the jury nulification option is no worse than other selective enforcement. It lets guilty people go free, sure, but it sometimes stops unjust incarceration.
Then they are either being discussed by your local government to be installes or they already subscribed to one of the equivelant compeditors. This shit is everywhere.
Because its a hypothetical where the journalist didnt specify “unlawful order”. Its a bs gocha question. There are hypothetical situations where it would be lawful, regardless of how likely.