Isn’t he a PiSser?

Given his notable track record, if I were a Big Tech company, I would hope that he refrains from exercising his self-proclaimed “art of the deal” for fear of potential bankruptcy.

Just to clarify, who was it that decided to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal?

tl;dr:
You have zero proof and are just wildly speculating to make up a story that fits your preferred narrative. As I already said: There is no reason to even consider this bs unless you come with a proof, which - to no surprise - you are unwilling to do.

We are not talking about the f-ing USA. We are talking about France.

Do you have any prove the trial was unfair? Any? No? Ok. Case closed!

The case of Le Pen still raises thorny questions for democracies: Should the rule of law apply always, or only most of the time? And when it comes to politicians, how can we trust the law is being applied without political considerations?

What a pile of BS.

There was a proper court that convicted her according to the applicable laws. Do we raise thorny questions if anyone else gets sentenced? Maybe the judge didn’t like the defendant because of his hairstyle?

Is there any prove that the trial was unfair? No? Than why are we talking about this at all?

This work is released under the MIT License (see LICENSE).

While Docs is a public driven initiative our licence choice is an invitation for private sector actors to use, sell and contribute to the project.

I hope that really takes off.

I mean I agree, but it’s a bit more than just a “So what?”

Why? I’m not American. In fact, the US threatened us with war, actively interferes with our domestic policies and attacks our democracy. For me it’s exactly that: “So what?”

There’s a difference between censoring sexual content or how-to-make pipebombs versus politics and free speech mate

Absolutely. But now we are in a discussion about what kind of censorship is ok. That’s not the point. the point was: There are no uncensored SOTA models.

I can’t remember exactly what I asked it about so I’m guessing right now. Maybe ask it how to best kill the US president or how to build a bomb to kill as many people as possible? Yes, I agree. Killing the US president is probably worse than talking bad about Xi but it’s censorship nonetheless.

I think I got some (unfounded) refusals because of something with copyright, if I remember correctly.

if it doesn’t even want to answer a basic question huh.

It would be better if it answers those question but this or later versions of it might be a perfect fit to be included as part of an Application/Service. There you simply do not need to answer questions about the CCP.

I’m really tired of this: “LOL. It doesn’t answer a question about Tianamen Square”. Yes it doesn’t and yes that is definitely not good but that doesn’t make this model any less impressive or usable.

That’s a finetuning of a censored model. Finetune Deepseek and you’ll probably get the same result.

there are uncensored models.

Which SOTA models are uncensored? Honest question. I had ChatGPT refusing to answer multiple times. ChatGPT refuses to answers even harmless questions. I tried it just now with a local Llama model: It’s censored too. Sure, they censor different things but they are censored nonetheless.

Edit:

I haven’t downvoted you.

It doesn’t want to answer topics that Lemmy’s most famous China-advocating accounts claim are no problem. Huh

So what? Every model is censored. That is true for the US based models too. Yes it would be better if all models where completely uncensored but in my use case I don’t spend my day asking questions about Winnie Puuh.

This is a fantastic model that is open source. It’s even commercially available for free and it is seemingly even better than the proprietary US based ones. It’s much cheaper too.

removed by mod

This has some strong “Her short skirt forced me to rape her” vibes

This has some strong Mafia vibes.

Banning them will defund them AND it bans any follow-up parties they would otherwise create.

And it will finally end their constant appearance on television, where they can advertise Nazi crap.

Your country is actively attacking our democracies and is threatening war over an European oversea territory.

We need all the help we can get.

Help with what? We cannot resist for you. That is something you have to do yourself outside of social media.

No it’s not. It’s a gGmbH. Notice the leading “g”. It’s a nonprofit company.

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemeinnützige_GmbH

Unfortunately there is no English translation of that page on Wikipedia.

There were gay Nazis?

E.g.: Ernst Röhm - the leader of the Nazi SA - was gay.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Röhm_scandal

And to make your head explode: There where jews who supported Hitler.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National_Jews

Spoiler: It didn’t end well.